[PATCH] Btrfs-progs: setup framework to corrupt specific fields of an inode

A user reported a problem with his fs where he had a bogus isize on his directory. In order to make sure my patch for fsck fixes this properly I needed to be able to corrupt an inode like this, which is what this patch is for. Eventually I want to extend this to corrupt everything so we can

[PATCH] Btrfs: don't allow the replace procedure on read only filesystems

If you start the replace procedure on a read only filesystem, at the end the procedure fails to write the updated dev_items to the chunk tree. The problem is that this error is not indicated except for a WARN_ON(). If the user now thinks that everything was done as expected and destroys the source

[PATCH] Btrfs-progs: allow fsck to fix directory isize errors

A user reported a problem where he was unable to rmdir an empty directory. This is because his isize was wrong. This patch will fix this sort of corruption and allow him to rmdir his directory. Thanks Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik jba...@fusionio.com --- cmds-check.c | 86

[PATCH] Btrfs: fix some basic sparse errors

Running sparse I found a few small things where we should have static functions that aren't used externally and we should be using unsigned values for bit fields. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik jba...@fusionio.com --- fs/btrfs/disk-io.c |8 fs/btrfs/send.c|4 ++-- 2

[PATCH v2] Btrfs: fix memory leak of orphan block rsv

When adding orphans to an inode's root, we start a transaction for that root that when ended in several places such as for example extent-tree.c:btrfs_remove_block_group(), inode.c:btrfs_unlink() and inode.c:btrfs_evict_node(), doesn't result in a commit, that is,

Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix some basic sparse errors

On 08/19/2013 20:21, Josef Bacik wrote: Running sparse I found a few small things where we should have static functions that aren't used externally and we should be using unsigned values for bit fields. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik jba...@fusionio.com --- fs/btrfs/disk-io.c |8

Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix some basic sparse errors

On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 08:47:21PM +0200, Stefan Behrens wrote: On 08/19/2013 20:21, Josef Bacik wrote: Running sparse I found a few small things where we should have static functions that aren't used externally and we should be using unsigned values for bit fields. Thanks,

Re: [PATCH 1/3] btrfs-progs: move out print in cmd_df to another function

+static void print_df(struct btrfs_ioctl_space_args *sargs) +{ + char description[80]; + char *total_bytes; + char *used_bytes; + u64 flags; + u64 i; + int written; + char g_str[64]; + int g_sz; + for (i = 0; i sargs-total_spaces; i++) { +

[PATCH v3] Btrfs: fix memory leak of orphan block rsv

This issue is simple to reproduce and observe if kmemleak is enabled. Two simple ways to reproduce it: ** 1 $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/loop0 $ mount /dev/loop0 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs balance start /mnt/btrfs $ umount /mnt/btrfs ** 2 $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/loop0 $ mount /dev/loop0 /mnt/btrfs $ touch

[PATCH v4] Btrfs: fix memory leak of orphan block rsv

This issue is simple to reproduce and observe if kmemleak is enabled. Two simple ways to reproduce it: ** 1 $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/loop0 $ mount /dev/loop0 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs balance start /mnt/btrfs $ umount /mnt/btrfs ** 2 $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/loop0 $ mount /dev/loop0 /mnt/btrfs $ touch

[PATCH v5] Btrfs: fix memory leak of orphan block rsv

This issue is simple to reproduce and observe if kmemleak is enabled. Two simple ways to reproduce it: ** 1 $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/loop0 $ mount /dev/loop0 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs balance start /mnt/btrfs $ umount /mnt/btrfs ** 2 $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/loop0 $ mount /dev/loop0 /mnt/btrfs $ touch

Re: [PATCH] xfstests: btrfs/009 never shrinked or removed $seqres.full

Thanks for the patch Stefan, it has been committed. --Rich commit 6bd8df93fa6b7d9ce402f9c665e5971106df7843 Author: Stefan Behrens sbehr...@giantdisaster.de Date: Fri Aug 16 17:44:54 2013 + xfstests: btrfs/009 never shrinked or removed $seqres.full Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens

Re: Cloning a Btrfs partition

Ok, so the fix is now in 3.10.6 and I'm using that. I don't get the hang anymore, but now I'm having a new problem. Mount options -- rw,noatime,nodiratime,compress-force=zlib,space_cache,inode_cache,ssd I need compression because I get a very high compression ratio with my data and I have lots

[PATCH] xfstests: add regression test for kernel bz 60673 V2

There was a problem with send trying to overwrite a file that wasn't actually the same. This is a test to check this particular case where receive fails when it should succeed properly. I tested this to verify it fails without my fix and passes with my fix. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik

BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1055 during balance.

Hi, during a balance I got the BUG from the subject line, followed by BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 0008a940. The machine needed to be rebooted afterwards; the filesystem was successfully mounted and the balance resumed and finished successfully. I then ran scrub which

[PATCH v6] Btrfs: fix memory leak of orphan block rsv

This issue is simple to reproduce and observe if kmemleak is enabled. Two simple ways to reproduce it: ** 1 $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/loop0 $ mount /dev/loop0 /mnt/btrfs $ btrfs balance start /mnt/btrfs $ umount /mnt/btrfs ** 2 $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/loop0 $ mount /dev/loop0 /mnt/btrfs $ touch

Re: Question: btrfs-progs releases?

Quoting Eric Sandeen (2013-08-17 23:50:51) On 8/17/13 10:25 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote: On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Chris Mason chris.ma...@fusionio.com wrote: The problem with the progs release is I keep finding more things I want to add. My local git tree has about a dozen commits