On 06/14/2014 04:53 AM, Duncan wrote:
Goffredo Baroncelli posted on Sat, 14 Jun 2014 00:19:31 +0200 as
excerpted:
On 06/13/2014 01:24 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:37:13PM +, Duncan wrote:
FWIW, either 4 byte or 8 MiB fallocate calls would be bad, I think
actually
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 04:46:25PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
-+ fprintf(stderr, \t-F : attempt to dump superblocks with bad magic\n);
+ fprintf(stderr, \t-F : attempt to dump superblocks with bad magic\n);
Whoa, git blame blames me, but that's not the patch I sent. ;)
My mistak while
Taking snapshots is now output this in addition of the snapshot
operation.
Transaction commit: none (default)
1) Is that expected/normal? It looks kind of spamming/useless to me?
2) If it's useful, what's the use I'm not getting?
Thanks,
Marc
--
A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 04:40:07PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
I did a balance on a system that had 3.11 (yes, I know, it's old). It hung.
So, I rebooted with 3.13, and it failed in fs/btrfs/relocation
Problem #1: I cannot stop the relocation. It starts on its own as soon as I
mount the FS,
Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net schrieb:
As they say, Whoosh!
At least here, I interpreted that remark as primarily sarcastic
commentary on the systemd devs' apparent attitude, which can be
(controversially) summarized as: Systemd doesn't have problems because
it's perfect. Therefore, any
Kai Krakow posted on Sat, 14 Jun 2014 12:59:31 +0200 as excerpted:
Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net schrieb:
As they say, Whoosh!
At least here, I interpreted that remark as primarily sarcastic
commentary on the systemd devs' apparent attitude, which can be
(controversially) summarized as:
Goffredo Baroncelli posted on Sat, 14 Jun 2014 09:52:39 +0200 as
excerpted:
On 06/14/2014 04:53 AM, Duncan wrote:
Goffredo Baroncelli posted on Sat, 14 Jun 2014 00:19:31 +0200 as
excerpted:
thanks for pointing that. However I am performing my tests on a fedora
20 with systemd-208, which
