On Fri, 15 Aug 2014 23:36:53 +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
This has been reported and discussed for a long time, and this hang occurs in
both 3.15 and 3.16.
Btrfs now migrates to use kernel workqueue, but it introduces this hang
problem.
Btrfs has a kind of work queued as an ordered way, which
Hi Chris,
FYI, we noticed increased performance and reduced power consumption on
commit 4c468fd74859d901c0b78b42bef189295e00d74f (btrfs: disable strict file
flushes for renames and truncates)
test case: lkp-sb02/blogbench/1HDD-btrfs
0954d74f8f37a47 4c468fd74859d901c0b78b42b
---
Hello. I am new to BTRFS, and I don't have it actually running on my
system as of yet, at least not for serious data. I am actually
hesitating whether or not to take the plunge and entrust my data to
this new FS.
I have been reading various articles on the wiki, lwn.net and
elsewhere re this FS.
Hello again. As I mentioned in my previous mail, I am not yet using
BTRFS for my real data. I'd like to know a few more things before
doing so.
Per my understanding of snapshots, unless I specifically mount the
subvolume and make changes to it, its contents will not change.
However, my
Hi Abhay,
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 05:30:35PM +0530, Abhay Sachan wrote:
Hi Fengguag,
Sorry for the out of topic question, but what benchmark is this?
I have heard about blogbench, but it doesn't give output in this format AFAIK.
It is blogbench run in the lkp-tests framework.
On 16.08.2014 12:15, Shriramana Sharma wrote:
[…] So nocow via chattr +C only means don't do COW unless this file
exists in another snapshot, right?
yes
attachment: justus_seifert.vcf
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Shriramana Sharma posted on Sat, 16 Aug 2014 15:36:48 +0530 as excerpted:
Hello. I am new to BTRFS, and I don't have it actually running on my
system as of yet, at least not for serious data. I am actually
hesitating whether or not to take the plunge and entrust my data to this
new FS.
FWIW,
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Chris Mason c...@fb.com wrote:
I've been running xfstests with these against your current git
overnight, but I'm queueing up longer tests as well. I understand
you may want to wait until rc2, but either way I'll get a sane queue
into my linux-next branch for
On 08/16/2014 11:11 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Chris Mason c...@fb.com wrote:
I've been running xfstests with these against your current git
overnight, but I'm queueing up longer tests as well. I understand
you may want to wait until rc2, but either way I'll
