On 16 July 2015 at 13:44, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
The choice of improper wasn't ideal on my part. There's nothing
directly wrong with nested subvolumes. But if you then combine them
with snapshots and rollbacks, there are consequences that include more
complication. If more
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 11:59:27PM +0100, fdman...@kernel.org wrote:
From: Filipe Manana fdman...@suse.com
Test that if we add hard links (in the same directory) to two files and
then fsync only one of the files, after the fsync log/journal is replayed
all the links exist and the filesystem
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 11:48:14AM +0800, Zhaolei wrote:
From: Zhao Lei zhao...@cn.fujitsu.com
Liu Bo bo.li@oracle.com reported a lockdep warning of
delayed_iput_sem in xfstests generic/241:
[ 2061.345955] =
[ 2061.346027] [ INFO: possible
From: Filipe Manana fdman...@suse.com
We have another case where after an fsync log replay we get an inode with
a wrong link count (smaller than it should be) and a number of directory
entries greater than its link count. This happens when we add a new link
hard link to our inode A and then we
From: Filipe Manana fdman...@suse.com
Test that if we add hard links (in the same directory) to two files and
then fsync only one of the files, after the fsync log/journal is replayed
all the links exist and the filesystem metadata (directory and file
inodes) is in a consistent state.
This test
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 01:12:03PM +1000, Paul Harvey wrote:
On 16 July 2015 at 11:35, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Johannes Ernst
johannes.er...@gmail.com wrote:
Cleaning this all up is a bit of pain, and
btrfs subvolume delete -r
From: Zhao Lei zhao...@cn.fujitsu.com
When mount failed because missing device, we can see following
dmesg:
[ 1060.267743] BTRFS: too many missing devices, writeable mount is not allowed
[ 1060.273158] BTRFS: open_ctree failed
This patch add missing_device_number and
From: Zhao Lei zhao...@cn.fujitsu.com
1: Use ARRAY_SIZE(types) to replace a static-value variant:
int num_types = 4;
2: Use 'continue' on condition to reduce one level tab
if (!XXX) {
code;
...
}
-
if (XXX)
continue;
code;
...
3: Put setting
On 2015-07-15 17:29, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
There is at least one superblock on every device, usually two, and
often three. Each superblock contains the virtual address of the roots
of the root tree, the chunk tree and the
From: Zhao Lei zhao...@cn.fujitsu.com
Code for updating fs_info-num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures in
btrfs_balance() lacks raid56 support.
Reason:
Above code was wroten in 2012-08-01, together with
btrfs_calc_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures()'s first version.
Then,
On 2015-07-14 07:49, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
So, after experiencing this same issue multiple times (on almost a dozen
different kernel versions since 4.0) and ruling out the possibility of it being
caused by my hardware (or at least, the RAM, SATA controller and disk drives
themselves),
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 2:56 AM, Filipe Manana fdman...@suse.com wrote:
Marc reported a problem where the receiving end of an incremental send
was performing clone operations that failed with -EINVAL. This happened
because, unlike for uncompressed extents, we were not checking if the
source
When running generic/311 on Btrfs' subpagesize-blocksize patchset (on ppc64
with 4k sectorsize and 16k node/leaf size) I noticed the following call trace,
BTRFS (device dm-0): parent transid verify failed on 29720576 wanted 160 found
158
BTRFS (device dm-0): parent transid verify failed on
Hi all,
While I'm developing a new btrfs inband dedup mechanism, I found btrfsck
and kernel doing strange behavior for clone.
[Reproducer]
# mount /dev/sdc -t btrfs /mnt/test
# dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/test/file1 bs=4K count=4
# sync
# ~/xfstests/src/cloner -s 4096 -l 4096 /mnt/test/file1
On 16 July 2015 at 17:59, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 01:12:03PM +1000, Paul Harvey wrote:
I for one would love to see authoritative documentation on proper
subvolume organization. I was completely lost when writing snazzer and
have so far received very little
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 4:06 AM, Paul Harvey csir...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:59 Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 01:12:03PM +1000, Paul Harvey wrote:
On 16 July 2015 at 11:35, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at
16 matches
Mail list logo
