Re: Chunk root problem

2017-07-09 Thread Daniel Brady
On 7/7/2017 1:06 AM, Daniel Brady wrote: > On 7/6/2017 11:48 PM, Roman Mamedov wrote: >> On Wed, 5 Jul 2017 22:10:35 -0600 >> Daniel Brady wrote: >> >>> parent transid verify failed >> >> Typically in Btrfs terms this means "you're screwed", fsck will not fix it, >> and >> nobody will know how to

Re: raid10 array lost with single disk failure?

2017-07-09 Thread Adam Bahe
I have finished all of the above suggestions, ran a scrub, remounted, rebooted, made sure the system didn't hang, and then kicked off another balance on the entire pool. It completed rather quickly but something still does not seem right. Label: 'btrfs_pool1' uuid: 04a7fa70-1572-47a2-a55c-7c99aef

Re: raid10 array lost with single disk failure?

2017-07-09 Thread Ferry Toth
Op Sat, 08 Jul 2017 20:51:41 +, schreef Duncan: > Adam Bahe posted on Fri, 07 Jul 2017 23:26:31 -0500 as excerpted: > >> I did recently upgrade the kernel a few days ago from >> 4.8.7-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64 to 4.10.6-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64. I had also >> added a new 6TB disk a few days ago but I'm

Re: 4.11.6 / more corruption / root 15455 has a root item with a more recent gen (33682) compared to the found root node (0)

2017-07-09 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Hello Duncan. Duncan - 09.07.17, 11:17: > Paul Jones posted on Sun, 09 Jul 2017 09:16:36 + as excerpted: > >> Marc MERLIN - 08.07.17, 21:34: > >> > This is now the 3rd filesystem I have (on 3 different machines) that > >> > is getting corruption of some kind (on 4.11.6). > >> > >> Anyone else

Re: Can I drop/reset files with corrupted data if they are in a read only snapshot?

2017-07-09 Thread Duncan
Marc MERLIN posted on Sat, 08 Jul 2017 22:32:28 -0700 as excerpted: > Second, ok, after a 24H scrub (yes, it's long and slow), I know which > filenames have issues. Problem is that they are inside a read only btrfs > snapshot. I cannot delete this snapshot because if I do so, I will > destroy a bt

Re: 4.11.6 / more corruption / root 15455 has a root item with a more recent gen (33682) compared to the found root node (0)

2017-07-09 Thread Duncan
Paul Jones posted on Sun, 09 Jul 2017 09:16:36 + as excerpted: >> Marc MERLIN - 08.07.17, 21:34: >> > >> > This is now the 3rd filesystem I have (on 3 different machines) that >> > is getting corruption of some kind (on 4.11.6). >> >> Anyone else getting corruptions with 4.11? >> >> I happil

RE: 4.11.6 / more corruption / root 15455 has a root item with a more recent gen (33682) compared to the found root node (0)

2017-07-09 Thread Paul Jones
> -Original Message- > From: linux-btrfs-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-btrfs- > ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Martin Steigerwald > Sent: Sunday, 9 July 2017 5:58 PM > To: Marc MERLIN > Cc: Lu Fengqi ; Btrfs BTRFS bt...@vger.kernel.org>; David Sterba > Subject: Re: 4.11.6 / mo

Re: 4.11.6 / more corruption / root 15455 has a root item with a more recent gen (33682) compared to the found root node (0)

2017-07-09 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Hello Marc. Marc MERLIN - 08.07.17, 21:34: > Sigh, > > This is now the 3rd filesystem I have (on 3 different machines) that is > getting corruption of some kind (on 4.11.6). Anyone else getting corruptions with 4.11? I happily switch back to 4.10.17 or even 4.9 if that is the case. I may even