Re: does using different uid/gid/forceuid/... mount options for different subvolumes work / does fuse.bindfs play nice with btrfs?

Ok, thanks for the clarification. Bindfs will continue to live on my machines then! Regards, Alexander On 20 June 2017 at 17:15, Hugo Mills <h...@carfax.org.uk> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 04:35:48PM +0200, Alexander Peganz wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> >> I

does using different uid/gid/forceuid/... mount options for different subvolumes work / does fuse.bindfs play nice with btrfs?

Hello everyone, I intend to provide different "views" of the data stored on btrfs subvolumes. e.g. mount a subvolume in location A rw; and ro in location B while also overwriting uids, gids, and permissions. In the past I have been using fuse.bindfs for this. Now I'm trying to find out if there

understanding differences in recoverability of raid1 vs raid10 and performance implications of unusual numbers of devices

Hello, I am trying to understand what differences there are in using btrfs raid1 vs raid10 in terms of recoverability and also performance. This has proven itself to be more difficult than expected since all search results I could come up with generally suffer from one of three flaws: they either