Re: Latest kernel to use?

On 25 September 2015 at 15:51, Hugo Mills wrote: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 03:36:18PM +0200, Sjoerd wrote: >> Thanks all for the feedback. Still doubting though to go for 4.2.1 or not. >> Main reason is that I am currently running 4.1.7 on my laptop which seems to >> work fine

Re: Latest kernel to use?

net> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Bostjan Skufca <bost...@a2o.si> wrote: >> >> Similar here: I am sticking with 3.19.2 which has proven to work fine for me > > I'd recommend still tracking SOME stable series. I'm sure there were > fixes in 3.19 for btrfs

Re: Chunk fullness distribution

Could please someone comment on this, especially whether I am on somewhat correct course, or did I completely miss the interpretation of btrfs-debug-tree output values? :) Thank you very much in advance, b. On 21 August 2015 at 23:18, Bostjan Skufca bost...@a2o.si wrote: Hi Duncan, tnx

Re: Chunk fullness distribution

wrote: Bostjan Skufca posted on Fri, 21 Aug 2015 17:49:01 +0200 as excerpted: is there a way to get information about how much space is occupied in each chunk? In the end, a simple ascii chart of usage distribution should be preferable, but I can work towards that if there is a way to get

Re: Current state of hot data relocation functionality

Anyone? On 18 September 2010 01:33, Bostjan Skufca bost...@a2o.si wrote: Hi all! I was looking into some custom fileserver options and noticed two facts about ZFS - support for L2ARC (albeit not persistant across reboots, which is a downer) and OpenSolaris being a dead meat. Then I found

Current state of hot data relocation functionality

Hi all! I was looking into some custom fileserver options and noticed two facts about ZFS - support for L2ARC (albeit not persistant across reboots, which is a downer) and OpenSolaris being a dead meat. Then I found out that some patches were already floating around linux mailinglists, patches