Re: btrfs double send

2015-10-25 Thread Ed Tomlinson
if there is anything you would like me to try. I am running 4.2 with the 4.3 for-linus tree applied and the 4.2.x patches with btrfs fixes removed. On top of this are a few patches from this list. TIA Ed Tomlinson On Saturday, October 24, 2015 1:52:21 PM EDT, Filipe Manana wrote: On Sat, Oct 24

Re: btrfs double send

2015-10-25 Thread Ed Tomlinson
a good testcase for any patches that appear. Meanwhile I've been falling back to rsync which always works but is so much slower. TIA Ed On Sunday, October 25, 2015 9:42:54 AM EDT, Filipe Manana wrote: On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Ed Tomlinson <e...@aei.ca> wrote: Filipe, Its

Re: [PATCH] btrfs: fix resending received snapshot with parent

2015-10-12 Thread Ed Tomlinson
of it along with this fix. Incremental sends are now working again. Tested-by: Ed Tomlinson <e...@aei.ca> This fixes a regression, can we please get into 4.3? Thanks Ed Tomlinson -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message

Re: btrfs send -c fails saying "parent determination failed"

2015-10-03 Thread Ed Tomlinson
Hi, I have the same problem here. I'd love to stop using rsync in place of send recieve. As with Paride my _working_ scripts just stop functioning... Thanks Ed on Tuesday, September 29, 2015 6:20:11 PM EDT, Paride Legovini wrote: Hi, btrfs send -c stopped working for me several months

What am I doing wrong?

2015-07-11 Thread Ed Tomlinson
be seen in the two subvol lists, yet send/recieve cannot seem to find it for an incremental backup. Why? TIA Ed Tomlinson -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org

Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs bug fixes

2015-07-01 Thread Ed Tomlinson
Chris, Have you looked at Omar Sandoval's [PATCH v2 0/5] Btrfs: RAID 5/6 missing device scrub+replace It would be really nice to have these when/if a disk dies... I been running with them since v1 without issue. Thanks Ed Tomlinson On Wednesday, July 1, 2015 1:24:41 PM EDT, Chris Mason

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Btrfs: RAID 5/6 missing device scrub+replace

2015-06-24 Thread Ed Tomlinson
On Wednesday, June 24, 2015 12:15:29 AM EDT, Omar Sandoval wrote: On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:07:00AM +0800, wangyf wrote: Hi, I have tested your PATCH v2 , but something wrong happened. kernel: 4.1.0-rc7+ with your five patches vitrualBox ubuntu14.10-server + LVM I make a new btrfs.ko with

Re: RAID1, SSD+non-SSD (RAID 5/6 question)

2015-02-07 Thread Ed Tomlinson
On Saturday, February 7, 2015 1:39:07 AM EST, Duncan wrote: The btrfs raid1 read-mode device choice algorithm Duncan, Very interesting suff on the raid1 read select alg. What changes with raid5/6? Is that alg 'smarter'? TIA Ed Tomlinson -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix find_free_dev_extent() malfunction in case device tree has hole

2015-02-03 Thread Ed Tomlinson
-03 2:40 GMT+08:00 Ed Tomlinson e...@aei.ca: On Monday, February 2, 2015 9:39:06 AM EST, Ed Tomlinson wrote: Hi Booting a kernel with the three patches: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix find_free_dev_extent() malfunction in case device tree has hole ... My fault, i should test these patches before i submit

Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix find_free_dev_extent() malfunction in case device tree has hole

2015-02-02 Thread Ed Tomlinson
Hi, Found a problem compile testing this. hole_size = key_offset - search_start; Should not that be key.offset ? TIA Ed Tomlinson On Monday, February 2, 2015 2:31:39 AM EST, Forrest Liu wrote: If device tree has hole, find_free_dev_extent() cannot find available address properly

Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] btrfs-progs: Add fixing function for inodes whose nlink dismatch

2014-12-03 Thread Ed Tomlinson
. Reported-by: Mike Gavrilov mikhail.v.gavri...@gmail.com Reported-by: Ed Tomlinson e...@aei.ca Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com --- changelog: v2: Use the a more generic fucntion, reset_nlink(), to repair the inode nlink. It will remove all, including valid

Re: [PATCH 0/6] More generic inode nlink repair function

2014-12-02 Thread Ed Tomlinson
fs one of which may be adding and populating a lost+found directory. Thanks Ed Tomlinson PS. It would be very interesting to find out WHY these files are ending up unlinked. Ideas? On Wednesday 03 December 2014 12:18:26 you wrote: Update on patch 4 and 6, other is not changed. This nlink

Re: Linux 3.0 release - btrfs possible locking deadlock

2011-07-25 Thread Ed Tomlinson
On Monday 25 July 2011 15:49:37 Chris Mason wrote: Excerpts from Ed Tomlinson's message of 2011-07-22 19:21:00 -0400: On Thursday 21 July 2011 22:59:53 Linus Torvalds wrote: So there it is. Gone are the 2.6.bignum days, and 3.0 is out. Hi, Managed to get this with btrfs

Re: Linux 3.0 release - btrfs possible locking deadlock

2011-07-22 Thread Ed Tomlinson
On Thursday 21 July 2011 22:59:53 Linus Torvalds wrote: So there it is. Gone are the 2.6.bignum days, and 3.0 is out. Hi, Managed to get this with btrfs rsync(ing) from ext4 to a btrfs fs with three partitions using raid1. [16018.211493] device fsid f7186eeb-60df-4b1a-890a-4a1eb42f81fe

Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs updates for 2.6.35

2010-06-15 Thread Ed Tomlinson
On Monday 14 June 2010 20:47:35 Chris Mason wrote: On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 03:24:19PM -0400, Ed Tomlinson wrote: On Friday 11 June 2010 15:37:31 Chris Mason wrote: Hello everyone, The master branch of the btrfs-unstable tree is a collection of fixes and cleanups, including two

Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs updates for 2.6.35

2010-06-14 Thread Ed Tomlinson
be looked into? I've kept the fs just in case. Thanks Ed Tomlinson Dan Carpenter (11) commits (+24/-17): Btrfs: handle error returns from btrfs_lookup_dir_item() (+2/-0) Btrfs: btrfs_read_fs_root_no_name() returns ERR_PTRs (+4/-0) Btrfs: unwind after btrfs_start_transaction() errors

[OPPS] btrfs on 33-3 with latest from btrfs-unstable.git master

2010-05-08 Thread Ed Tomlinson
[ 2302.339860] CR2: 0030 [ 2302.343138] ---[ end trace e68668d9a065c83e ]--- idea? TIA Ed Tomlinson -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo

Re: [LOCKING] 2.6.33-rc8 btrfs vs java

2010-02-15 Thread Ed Tomlinson
On Monday 15 February 2010 10:56:53 Chris Mason wrote: On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 07:14:50PM -0500, Ed Tomlinson wrote: Hi, Found this in my log for 2.6.33-rc8. Figgured it might be interesting since .33 is close. The btrfs tree locking is very tricky for lockdep. I don't quite see

[LOCKING] 2.6.33-rc8 btrfs vs java

2010-02-14 Thread Ed Tomlinson
Hi, Found this in my log for 2.6.33-rc8. Figgured it might be interesting since .33 is close. Thanks, Ed [102331.564869] [102331.564871]

Re: Btrfs for mainline

2009-01-04 Thread Ed Tomlinson
I don't think it's worth waiting a release or two to merge something. I like this idea. I also want to test btrfs. but I'm not interested out of tree code. I'll second this. Please get btrfsdev into mainline asap. TIA Ed Tomlinson -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe