On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 06:44:43PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Nick Terrell wrote:
The stack trace looks like the bug fixed by
Qu Wenruo:
btrfs: Fix wild memory access in compression level parser [1]
That fix looks to be included in the
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 06:13:43PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> You are missing the patch set which includes
>https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8659651/
>
> btrfs: refactor btrfs_dev_replace_start for reuse
Sorry that comes in another patchset and the robot currently is not
Hi all,
I see 2 __might_sleep() warnings on when running LKP tests on
v3.19-rc6, one related to raid5 and another related to btrfs.
They might be exposed by this patch.
commit 8eb23b9f35aae413140d3fda766a98092c21e9b0
Author: Peter Zijlstra pet...@infradead.org
sched: Debug nested
Hi Chris,
We noticed an xfstests failure on commit
8d875f95da43c6a8f18f77869f2ef26e9594fecc (btrfs: disable strict file flushes
for renames and truncates)
It's 100% reproducible in the 5 test runs.
test case: snb-drag/xfstests/4HDD-btrfs-generic-mid
27b9a8122ff71a8 8d875f95da43c6a8f18f77869
Hi Chris,
FYI, we noticed increased performance and reduced power consumption on
commit 4c468fd74859d901c0b78b42bef189295e00d74f (btrfs: disable strict file
flushes for renames and truncates)
test case: lkp-sb02/blogbench/1HDD-btrfs
0954d74f8f37a47 4c468fd74859d901c0b78b42b
---
-btrfs.yaml
$ bin/run-local ./blogbench-1HDD-btrfs.yaml
The report is generated by the sbin/compare script.
Thanks,
Fengguang
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Fengguang Wu fengguang...@intel.com wrote:
Hi Chris,
FYI, we noticed increased performance and reduced power consumption
Hi Filipe,
If you disable CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_RUN_SANITY_TESTS, does it still crash?
I tried disabling CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_RUN_SANITY_TESTS in the reported 3
randconfigs and they all boot fine.
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 03:10:37PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello, David, Fengguang, Chris.
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 01:13:06PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Fengguang Wu wrote:
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 02:13:59AM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014
If you disable CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_RUN_SANITY_TESTS, does it still crash?
Good idea! I've queued test jobs for that config. However sorry that
I'll be offline for the next 2 days. So please expect some delays.
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 02:13:59AM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Fengguang Wu wrote:
[1.625020] BTRFS: selftest: Running btrfs_split_item tests
[1.627004] BTRFS: selftest: Running find delalloc tests
[2.289182] tsc: Refined TSC clocksource calibration
Hi Steven,
We noticed xfstests generic/299 TFAIL on btrfs since
commit 9fe55eea7e4b444bafc42facc2d1d2847275
Author: Steven Whitehouse swhit...@redhat.com
AuthorDate: Fri Jan 24 14:42:22 2014 +
Commit: Al Viro v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk
CommitDate: Sun Jan 26 08:26:42 2014 -0500
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 04:47:38PM -0800, Muthu Kumar wrote:
OK, after a bit more staring I believe the correct fix is the following.
Fengguang, Please try this one?
Yes, it runs fine now!
Tested-by: Fengguang Wu fengguang...@intel.com
Thanks,
Fengguang
In btrfs_end_bio
Hi Josef,
FYI. We are doing 0day performance tests and happen to notice that
btrfs write throughput increased considerably during v3.10-11 time
frame:
v3.10 v3.11 v3.12
v3.13-rc6
--- -
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 08:04:58AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Fengguang Wu fengguang...@intel.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 07:56:35PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
Hi!
Which tree is 'devel-snb'? I don't see that on the kernel.org trees.
It's my local
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 07:56:35PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
Hi!
Which tree is 'devel-snb'? I don't see that on the kernel.org trees.
It's my local merge branch, based on the latest upstream release.
Let's CC the btrfs developers for this warning. :)
Thanks,
Fengguang
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:12:11PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
On Thu 10-01-13 13:47:57, Miao Xie wrote:
writeback_inodes_sb(_nr)_if_idle() is re-implemented by replacing
down_read()
with down_read_trylock() because
- If -s_umount is write locked, then the sb is not idle. That is
Hi Fengguang,
Hi Stefan!
Assuming that your script performs a periodic git fetch and git reset,
and then starts compile runs on different architectures, the only
explanation that I have is that something went wrong with the git
operation in your script. It looks like some C source files
backend Open Source Technology Center
Fengguang Wu, Yuanhan Liu Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 09:57:47PM +0100, Alexander Block wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 9:51 PM, kbuild test robot
fengguang...@intel.com wrote:
tree: git://github.com/ablock84/linux-btrfs.git btrfs-far
head: f9a5bb450a8cc7aa5fd4f11d0306b3f48cf2771d
commit:
is
not required.
Version 2: Fixed the incorrect indentation.
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra D Prabhu rpra...@wnohang.net
---
fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 4 +---
mm/filemap.c | 3 +--
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Fengguang Wu fengguang...@intel.com
Thanks
)) {
+ page_cache_async_readahead(inode-i_mapping,
+ ra, NULL, page, index,
+ last_index + 1 - index);
That extra indent is not necessary.
Otherwise looks good to me. Thanks!
Reviewed-by: Fengguang
Centre
Fengguang Wu, Yuanhan Liu Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
#include asm/cpufeature.h
35 #include compat.h
36 #include ctree.h
37 #include disk-io.h
---
0-DAY kernel build testing backend Open Source Technology Centre
Fengguang Wu, Yuanhan Liu Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
inode_fs_paths *ipath)
1634 {
1635 if (!ipath)
1636 return;
1637 vfree(ipath-fspath);
1638 kfree(ipath);
1639 }
---
0-DAY kernel build testing backend Open Source Technology Centre
Fengguang Wu, Yuanhan Liu Intel
Fix a real bug caught by coccinelle.
fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1013:1-11: second lock on line 1013
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu fengguang...@intel.com
---
fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c |5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- linux.orig/fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c 2012-08-03 15
No behavior change, code generated by: scripts/coccicheck/api/ptr_ret.cocci
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu fengguang...@intel.com
---
fs/btrfs/volumes.c |5 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- linux.orig/fs/btrfs/volumes.c 2012-08-04 15:33:02.038203882 +0800
(new_root_item);
---
0-DAY kernel build testing backend Open Source Technology Centre
Fengguang Wu w...@linux.intel.com Intel Corporation
#
# Automatically generated file; DO NOT EDIT.
# Linux/x86_64 3.5.0 Kernel Configuration
#
CONFIG_64BIT=y
# CONFIG_X86_32 is not set
27 matches
Mail list logo