Hi,
On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 15:35:35 -0800
Liu Bo <bo.li@oracle.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 02:00:07AM -0500, Jérôme Carretero wrote:
> > [ cut here ] [633254.461294] WARNING: CPU:
> > 3 PID: 20953 at /usr/src/linux/fs/btrfs/raid56.c:848
>
Hi Duncan,
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 21:57:47 + (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Jérôme Carretero posted on Mon, 20 Nov 2017 01:43:44 -0500 as
> excerpted:
>
> > While doing a test (to evaluate drives), where I'm filling a bunch
> > of drives in RAI
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 02:00:07 -0500
Jérôme Carretero <cj...@zougloub.eu> wrote:
> [ cut here ]
It should be noted that the filesystem doesn't want to be unmounted now.
Regards,
--
Jérôme
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscri
Hi,
This was while doing a "userspace scrub" with "tar c":
[633250.707455] btrfs_print_data_csum_error: 14608 callbacks suppressed
[633250.707459] BTRFS warning (device dm-18): csum failed root 5 ino 1376 off
3530293248 csum 0xb8c194fb expected csum 0xb3680c88 mirror 2
[633250.707465] BTRFS
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 01:43:44 -0500
Jérôme Carretero <cj...@zougloub.eu> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> While doing a test (to evaluate drives), where I'm filling a bunch of
> drives in RAID6, one of the disks failed in the process.
> (System with v4.14 / ECC).
> I remounted the
Hi,
While doing a test (to evaluate drives), where I'm filling a bunch of
drives in RAID6, one of the disks failed in the process.
(System with v4.14 / ECC).
I remounted the array in degraded, launched a "btrfs delete missing"
as I have no replacement device.
The command (takes ages and) fails
Hi Yan,
I was attempting to migrate a JBOD drive set to RAID1,
so I did a balance filter, which failed because free space was missing,
then I attempted to remove a device from the set (because I also wanted
to do that more urgently than the RAID1 migration), and got:
[ 6973.725608] kernel BUG
Hi,
I updated 2 computers to 3.16-rc1 and they both did the same thing when
mounting the rootfs: after entering the login/password, the shell didn't
appear.
120 seconds later, there is a message about a hung task, it's about
fsync not finishing, with a traceback showing SyS_fsync / ... /
On Sat, 13 Jul 2013 12:14:04 -0400
Jérôme Carretero cj...@zougloub.eu wrote:
Within the UML instance with python, I cannot do `ls` (`os.listdir()`)
on my home folder (`/home/cJ`), and btrfs-restore only restores
a few dot files in there.
But I can get inode numbers and read files
Hi there,
Experiencing an broken FS in a state I haven't seen before.
I was running linux-3.10 on my laptop, which I had tried to put to sleep
with an external btrfs partition attached.
On resume, the external partition was lost.
I was able to unmount it, despite many kernel warnings.
Then I
Hi Jeff,
I had a good surprise today when one of my BTRFS drives decided
to not wake up from sleep : I was able to unmount it properly !
So I just wanted to say thank you.
Regards,
--
cJ
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:20:21 -0500
Jérôme Carretero cj...@zougloub.eu wrote:
My filesystem is super-sluggish since about a week, and perf top tells me
that find_next_bit(), find_next_zero_bit() is eating my netbook's CPU.
The kernel is 3.3-rc3+188 (g3ec1e88) and I don't use this laptop a lot
Hi,
So, it happened when doing btrfs subvolume delete $path.
I was filling in my report and decided to check the volume with the latest
btrfsck
(the distro-provided one found nothing, but it is quite old) and
dangerdonteveruse
from today gave zillions of errors, so this bug report concerns
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:11:29 +0530
Nageswara R Sastry rnsas...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Hello,
While working with 'fsfuzz - file system fuzzing tool' on 'btrfs'
encountered the following kernel bug.
I inquired about robustness a while ago and it seems it's at some point on the
horizon,
Dear devs,
My filesystem is super-sluggish since about a week, and perf top tells me
that find_next_bit(), find_next_zero_bit() is eating my netbook's CPU.
The kernel is 3.3-rc3+188 (g3ec1e88) and I don't use this laptop a lot,
so I'm ready to cooperate.
In the btrfs-transaction thread, in
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 19:38:37 +
810d4rk 810d...@gmail.com wrote:
[ 4836.897206] sd 20:0:0:0: [sdc] Attached SCSI disk
[ 4844.803652] EXT3-fs (dm-1): error: can't find ext3 filesystem on dev dm-1.
[ 4844.856054] EXT2-fs (dm-1): error: can't find an ext2 filesystem on dev
dm-1.
[
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 21:43:50 +
810d4rk 810d...@gmail.com wrote:
These printks indicate that the encryption or password is not the same as
used when creating the device.
So at this stage, this has nothing to do with btrfs.
No, Ive decrypted the volume with the password, I can confirm
I have a couple of questions concerning btrfs reliability.
I'm currently using btrfs in my internal drives (strong advantages) and have
used it on external drives, but I've recently migrated the external ones to
ext4, for reliability reasons.
The kernel seems to be able to handle ext4 partition
I have a couple of questions concerning btrfs reliability.
I'm currently using btrfs in my internal drives (strong advantages) and have
used it on external drives, but I've recently migrated the external ones to
ext4, for reliability reasons.
The kernel seems to be able to handle ext4 partition
19 matches
Mail list logo
