On to, 2011-05-05 at 13:57 -0700, cac...@quantum-sci.com wrote:
On Thursday 5 May, 2011 13:31:17 cwillu wrote:
I took the liberty of asking #debian, and they've requested that you
file a bug in their bug tracker. They've also suggested that you
might be able to short-circuit the faulty
On to, 2011-02-10 at 10:29 -0300, Eduardo Silva wrote:
[PATCH] Add safe string manipulation functions
Deprecate direct use of strcpy(3)
The following string manipulation function has been added:
- string_copy() : wrapper of strcpy(3)
- string_ncopy(): wrapper of strncpy(3)
both
On to, 2011-02-10 at 11:37 +, Jeremy Sanders wrote:
There's strlcpy, but it's not in glibc because of possible truncation
errors!
snprintf is standard, and should be about as safe as it gets with the
glibc functions.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs
On ke, 2011-01-05 at 14:46 -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
Blah blah blah, I'm not having an argument about which is better because I
simply do not care. I think dedup is silly to begin with, and online dedup
even
sillier. The only reason I did offline dedup was because I was just toying
around
On ke, 2011-01-05 at 19:58 +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
(For my script, see find-duplicate-chunks in
http://code.liw.fi/debian/pool/main/o/obnam/obnam_0.14.tar.gz or get the
current code using bzr get http://code.liw.fi/obnam/bzr/trunk/;.
http://braawi.org/obnam/ is the home page of the backup
