[PATCH 3/3] [PATCH] btrfs-progs: mkfs support for extended inode refs

2012-06-07 Thread Mark Fasheh
From: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com This patch turns on the BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_EXTENDED_IREF superblock flag when creating a new file system in mkfs, enabling extended inode refs. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.de --- mkfs.c | 13 - 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5

[PATCH 0/3] btrfs: extended inode refs

2012-05-21 Thread Mark Fasheh
a second iterate function for extended refs, I fixed up iterate_irefs_t arguments to take the raw information from whatever ref version we're coming from. This removed a bunch of duplicated code. - I am actually including a patch to btrfs-progs with this drop. :) From: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com

[PATCH 3/3] btrfs: extended inode refs

2012-05-21 Thread Mark Fasheh
From: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com The iterate_irefs in backref.c is used to build path components from inode refs. This patch adds code to iterate extended refs as well. I had modify the callback function signature to abstract out some of the differences between ref structures. iref_to_path

[PATCH 2/3] btrfs: extended inode refs

2012-05-21 Thread Mark Fasheh
From: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com Teach tree-log.c about extended inode refs. In particular, we have to adjust the behavior of inode ref replay as well as log tree recovery to account for the existence of extended refs. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.de --- fs/btrfs/backref.c | 68

Re: [PATCH 3/3] btrfs: extended inode refs

2012-05-08 Thread Mark Fasheh
. Yep. Thanks Jan! --Mark -- Mark Fasheh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH 2/3] btrfs: extended inode refs

2012-05-03 Thread Mark Fasheh
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 03:08:35PM +0200, Jan Schmidt wrote: On 05.04.2012 22:09, Mark Fasheh wrote: Teach tree-log.c about extended inode refs. In particular, we have to adjust the behavior of inode ref replay as well as log tree recovery to account for the existence of extended refs

Re: [PATCH 2/3] btrfs: extended inode refs

2012-05-01 Thread Mark Fasheh
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 05:53:15PM +0200, Jan Schmidt wrote: Hi Mark, While reading 3/3 I stumbled across one more thing in this one: On 05.04.2012 22:09, Mark Fasheh wrote: +int btrfs_find_one_extref(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 inode_objectid, + u64 start_off

Re: [PATCH 1/3] btrfs: extended inode refs

2012-04-24 Thread Mark Fasheh
Schmidt list.bt...@jan-o-sch.net Thanks again Jan. I'll be sure to CC you on my next drop! --Mark -- Mark Fasheh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo

Re: [PATCH 0/3] btrfs: extended inode refs

2012-04-12 Thread Mark Fasheh
-- Mark Fasheh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH 1/3] btrfs: extended inode refs

2012-04-05 Thread Mark Fasheh
This patch adds basic support for extended inode refs. This includes support for link and unlink of the refs, which basically gets us support for rename as well. Inode creation does not need changing - extended refs are only added after the ref array is full. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas

[PATCH 2/3] btrfs: extended inode refs

2012-04-05 Thread Mark Fasheh
Teach tree-log.c about extended inode refs. In particular, we have to adjust the behavior of inode ref replay as well as log tree recovery to account for the existence of extended refs. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.de --- fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 320

[PATCH 3/3] btrfs: extended inode refs

2012-04-05 Thread Mark Fasheh
differences in the two disk structures. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.de --- fs/btrfs/backref.c | 200 ++-- fs/btrfs/backref.h |4 +- 2 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/backref.c b/fs/btrfs/backref.c

Re: [Cluster-devel] fallocate vs O_(D)SYNC

2011-11-16 Thread Mark Fasheh
generic_write_sync(file, pos, len), and that would be completely transparent to userspace. We should do it per FS though, I'll patch up btrfs. I agree about doing it per FS. Ocfs2 just needs a one-liner to mark the journal transaction as synchronous. --Mark -- Mark Fasheh -- To unsubscribe

Re: [Cluster-devel] fallocate vs O_(D)SYNC

2011-11-16 Thread Mark Fasheh
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:35:40AM -0800, Mark Fasheh wrote: We should do it per FS though, I'll patch up btrfs. I agree about doing it per FS. Ocfs2 just needs a one-liner to mark the journal transaction as synchronous. Joel, here's an (untested) patch to fix this in Ocfs2. --Mark

Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] vfs: allow /proc/pid/maps to return a custom device

2011-10-07 Thread Mark Fasheh
greater degree than just allowing an optional deref of whatever structure btrfs (and similar file systems) have to point to the right block device. Is this really the way we would like to proceed? Chris, maybe you can chime in here? --Mark On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 01:18:26PM -0700, Mark Fasheh

[PATCH 0/20] btrfs: More error handling fixes

2011-09-15 Thread Mark Fasheh
of bubbling errors up the stack. The patches were tested using some simple file system commands and a background kernel build. Please review, all constructive feedback is appreciated :) Thanks, --Mark -- Mark Fasheh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in the body

[PATCH 01/20] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON errors from btrfs_create_subvol_root()

2011-09-15 Thread Mark Fasheh
From: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com This is called from only one place - create_subvol() which passes errors safely back out to it's caller, btrfs_mksubvol where they are handled. Additionally, btrfs_create_subvol_root() itself bug's needlessly from error return of btrfs_update_inode(). Since

[PATCH 04/20] btrfs: make insert_ptr() void

2011-09-15 Thread Mark Fasheh
From: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com insert_ptr() always returns zero, so all the exta error handling can go away. This makes it trivial to also make copy_for_split() a void function as it's only return was from insert_ptr(). Finally, this all makes the BUG_ON(ret) in split_leaf() meaningless so I

[PATCH 02/20] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON() errors in update_ref_for_cow()

2011-09-15 Thread Mark Fasheh
From: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com The only caller of update_ref_for_cow() is __btrfs_cow_block() which was originally ignoring any return values. update_ref_for_cow() however doesn't look like a candidate to become a void function - there are a few places where errors can occur. So instead I

[PATCH 06/20] btrfs: fix error check of btrfs_lookup_dentry()

2011-09-15 Thread Mark Fasheh
...@jp.fujitsu.com Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.de --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 12 ++-- fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 11 +-- 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 15fceef..5fdb700 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs

[PATCH 08/20] btrfs: make del_ptr() and btrfs_del_leaf() void

2011-09-15 Thread Mark Fasheh
From: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com Since fixup_low_keys() has been made void, del_ptr() always returns zero. We can then make it void as well. This allows us in turn to make btrfs_del_leaf() void as the only return value it was previously catching was from del_ptr(). This winds up removing

[PATCH 10/20] btrfs: go readonly on insert error in btrfs_add_root_ref()

2011-09-15 Thread Mark Fasheh
From: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com In btrfs_add_root_ref() we BUG if an error is encountered during REF/BACKREF insertion. This does not look like a logic error, thus the BUG is not called for. However, I don't think there's a simple way to recover from such an error at that point, so we mark

[PATCH 14/20] btrfs: Document BUG() in find_lock_delalloc_range()

2011-09-15 Thread Mark Fasheh
From: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com We BUG_ON a nonzero, non -EAGAIN ret from lock_delalloc_range(). As it turns out there is no other possible return value that makes sense anyway. The bare BUG_ON(ret) was a bit confusing and looked like something that needed fixing. This patch documents

[PATCH 15/20] btrfs: Go readonly on missing ref in btrfs_get_parent()

2011-09-15 Thread Mark Fasheh
From: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com btrfs_get_parent() searches the btree for a ref to the current object. From there it can compute the parent objectid from which it can return a dentry. if the reference is not found in the tree however, we BUG(). I believe a more appropriate response would

[PATCH 18/20] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON insert errors in btrfs_alloc_dev_extent()

2011-09-15 Thread Mark Fasheh
The only caller of btrfs_alloc_dev_extent() is __btrfs_alloc_chunk() which already bugs on any error returned. We can remove the BUG_ON's in btrfs_alloc_dev_extent() then since __btrfs_alloc_chunk() will catch them anyway. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.de --- fs/btrfs/volumes.c |4

[PATCH 20/20] btrfs: Remove BUG_ON from __finish_chunk_alloc()

2011-09-15 Thread Mark Fasheh
btrfs_alloc_chunk() unconditionally BUGs on any error returned from __finish_chunk_alloc() so there's no need for two BUG_ON lines. Remove the one from __finish_chunk_alloc(). Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.de --- fs/btrfs/volumes.c |4 +++- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1

[PATCH 16/20] btrfs: make add_delayed_ref_head() void

2011-09-15 Thread Mark Fasheh
From: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com This is trivial as the function always returns success. We can remove 3 BUG_ON(ret) lines as a result. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com --- fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.c | 26 ++ 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 16 deletions

[PATCH 19/20] btrfs: Remove BUG_ON from __btrfs_alloc_chunk()

2011-09-15 Thread Mark Fasheh
We BUG_ON() error from add_extent_mapping(), but that error looks pretty easy to bubble back up - as far as I can tell there have not been any permanent modifications to fs state at that point. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.de --- fs/btrfs/volumes.c |3 ++- 1 files changed, 2

[PATCH 17/20] btrfs: make add_delayed_tree_ref() void

2011-09-15 Thread Mark Fasheh
From: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com add_delayed_tree_ref() unconditionally returns 0. This makes it trivial to turn into a void function. This kills another BUG_ON(). Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com --- fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.c | 16 +++- 1 files changed, 7 insertions

[PATCH 11/20] btrfs: Go readonly on bad extent refs in update_ref_for_cow()

2011-09-15 Thread Mark Fasheh
From: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com update_ref_for_cow() will BUG_ON() after it's call to btrfs_lookup_extent_info() if no existing references are found. Since refs are computed directly from disk, this should be treated as a corruption instead of a logic error. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas

[PATCH 13/20] btrfs: Go readonly on tree errors in balance_level

2011-09-15 Thread Mark Fasheh
From: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com balace_level() seems to deal with missing tree nodes by BUG_ON(). Instead, we can easily just set the file system readonly and bubble -EROFS back up the stack. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com --- fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 13 +++-- 1 files

[PATCH 12/20] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON errors from update_ref_for_cow()

2011-09-15 Thread Mark Fasheh
From: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com __btrfs_cow_block(), the only caller of update_ref_for_cow() will BUG_ON() any error return. Instead, we can go read-only fs as update_ref_for_cow() manipulates disk data in a way which doesn't look like it's easily rolled back. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas

[PATCH 07/20] btrfs: make fixup_low_keys() void

2011-09-15 Thread Mark Fasheh
From: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com This is trivial - fixup_low_keys always returns zero so we can make it void. As a result, we can then make setup_items_for_insert() void too which lets us cut out a couple of BUG_ON(ret) lines. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.de --- fs/btrfs/ctree.c

[PATCH 09/20] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON failures in find_and_setup_root()

2011-09-15 Thread Mark Fasheh
From: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com This is very easy - we can just pass an error from btrfs_find_last_root() back out to the callers - all of them have proper error handling. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.de --- fs/btrfs/disk-io.c |3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1

[PATCH 05/20] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON errors in __finish_chunk_alloc()

2011-09-15 Thread Mark Fasheh
From: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com All callers of __finish_chunk_alloc() BUG_ON() return value, so it's trivial for us to always bubble up any errors caught in __finish_chunk_alloc() to be caught there. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.de --- fs/btrfs/volumes.c |7 ++- 1 files

[PATCH 0/8] btrfs: Error handling fixes

2011-08-18 Thread Mark Fasheh
Hi, The following are assorted fixes to error handling from all parts of the Btrfs code. Every patch in this series stands on it's own, with the exception of the last patch which relies on the one before it (so patches 7 and 8 can be considered a pair). I also included in this series an

[PATCH 1/8] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON errors from btrfs_create_subvol_root()

2011-08-18 Thread Mark Fasheh
From: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com This is called from only one place - create_subvol() which passes errors safely back out to it's caller, btrfs_mksubvol where they are handled. Additionally, btrfs_create_subvol_root() itself bug's needlessly from error return of btrfs_update_inode(). Since

[PATCH 2/8] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON() errors in update_ref_for_cow()

2011-08-18 Thread Mark Fasheh
From: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com The only caller of update_ref_for_cow() is __btrfs_cow_block() which was originally ignoring any return values. update_ref_for_cow() however doesn't look like a candidate to become a void function - there are a few places where errors can occur. So instead I

[PATCH 3/8] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON kzalloc error in btrfs_lookup_csums_range()

2011-08-18 Thread Mark Fasheh
From: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com Unfortunately it isn't enough to just exit here - the kzalloc() happens in a loop and the allocated items are added to a linked list whose head is passed in from the caller. To fix the BUG_ON() and also provide the semantic that the list passed in is only

[PATCH 4/8] btrfs: make insert_ptr() void

2011-08-18 Thread Mark Fasheh
From: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com insert_ptr() always returns zero, so all the exta error handling can go away. This makes it trivial to also make copy_for_split() a void function as it's only return was from insert_ptr(). Finally, this all makes the BUG_ON(ret) in split_leaf() meaningless so I

[PATCH 6/8] btrfs: fix error check of btrfs_lookup_dentry()

2011-08-18 Thread Mark Fasheh
...@jp.fujitsu.com Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.de --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 12 ++-- fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 11 +-- 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 7028c0c..9f3a85d 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs

[PATCH 7/8] btrfs: make fixup_low_keys() void

2011-08-18 Thread Mark Fasheh
From: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com This is trivial - fixup_low_keys always returns zero so we can make it void. As a result, we can then make setup_items_for_insert() void too which lets us cut out a couple of BUG_ON(ret) lines. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.de --- fs/btrfs/ctree.c

[PATCH 5/8] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON errors in __finish_chunk_alloc()

2011-08-18 Thread Mark Fasheh
From: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com All callers of __finish_chunk_alloc() BUG_ON() return value, so it's trivial for us to always bubble up any errors caught in __finish_chunk_alloc() to be caught there. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.de --- fs/btrfs/volumes.c |7 ++- 1 files

[PATCH 8/8] btrfs: make del_ptr() and btrfs_del_leaf() void

2011-08-18 Thread Mark Fasheh
From: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com Since fixup_low_keys() has been made void, del_ptr() always returns zero. We can then make it void as well. This allows us in turn to make btrfs_del_leaf() void as the only return value it was previously catching was from del_ptr(). This winds up removing

[PATCH] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON kzalloc error in btrfs_lookup_csums_range()

2011-08-08 Thread Mark Fasheh
and verifying that when this hits (git clone seemed to exercise this), the function throws the proper error. Unfortunately but predictably, we later hit a BUG_ON(ret) type line that still hasn't been fixed up ;) Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com --- fs/btrfs/file-item.c | 15

[PATCH] btrfs: make insert_ptr() void

2011-08-08 Thread Mark Fasheh
insert_ptr() always returns zero, so all the exta error handling can go away. This makes it trivial to also make copy_for_split() a void function as it's only return was from insert_ptr(). Finally, this all makes the BUG_ON(ret) in split_leaf() meaningless so I removed that. Signed-off-by: Mark

[PATCH] btrfs: Handle NULL inode return from btrfs_lookup_dentry()

2011-08-05 Thread Mark Fasheh
pretty high up the call path at this point. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com --- fs/btrfs/ioctl.c |8 +--- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c index 7cf0133..fc9525f 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c

[PATCH] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON errors from btrfs_create_subvol_root()

2011-08-05 Thread Mark Fasheh
errors we can bubble this one up too. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com --- fs/btrfs/inode.c |3 +-- fs/btrfs/ioctl.c |2 ++ 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 15fceef..7028c0c 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b

Re: [PATCH 7/7] btrfs: don't BUG_ON allocation errors in btrfs_drop_snapshot

2011-07-25 Thread Mark Fasheh
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 09:45:19AM +0900, Tsutomu Itoh wrote: (2011/07/22 4:48), Mark Fasheh wrote: In addition to properly handling allocation failure from btrfs_alloc_path, I also fixed up the kzalloc error handling code immediately below it. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com

Re: [PATCH 6/7] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON alloc_path errors in find_next_chunk

2011-07-25 Thread Mark Fasheh
, extent_root, flags); + if (ret 0 ret != -ENOSPC) + return ret; + You need mutex_unlock() before return. Of course... Here's an updated patch (git tree has also been updated). Thanks, --Mark -- Mark Fasheh From: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com [PATCH] btrfs: Don't

[PATCH 0/7] btrfs: don't BUG_ON btrfs_alloc_path errors v2

2011-07-21 Thread Mark Fasheh
Changelog: - Updated patch 6 after review from Tsutomu Itoh Hi, The following patches attempt to replace all the paths where we BUG_ON the return value of btrfs_alloc_path with proper error handling. It's pretty clear that these places aren't BUGing because of code error. To be

[PATCH 1/7] btrfs: don't BUG_ON btrfs_alloc_path() errors

2011-07-21 Thread Mark Fasheh
, btrfs_lookup_csums_range, btrfs_csum_file_blocks, btrfs_mark_extent_written, btrfs_inode_by_name, btrfs_new_inode, btrfs_symlink, insert_reserved_file_extent, and run_delalloc_nocow Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com --- fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 12 +--- fs/btrfs/file-item.c |7 +-- fs

[PATCH 2/7] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON alloc_path errors in replay_one_buffer()

2011-07-21 Thread Mark Fasheh
The two -process_func call sites in tree-log.c which were ignoring a return code have also been updated to gracefully exit as well. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com --- fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 12 +--- 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs

[PATCH 3/7] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON alloc_path errors in btrfs_truncate_inode_items

2011-07-21 Thread Mark Fasheh
I moved the path allocation up a few lines to the top of the function so that we couldn't get into the state where we've dropped delayed items and the extent cache but fail due to -ENOMEM. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com --- fs/btrfs/inode.c |9 + 1 files changed, 5

[PATCH 7/7] btrfs: don't BUG_ON allocation errors in btrfs_drop_snapshot

2011-07-21 Thread Mark Fasheh
In addition to properly handling allocation failure from btrfs_alloc_path, I also fixed up the kzalloc error handling code immediately below it. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com --- fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c |8 ++-- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git

[PATCH 5/7] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON alloc_path errors in btrfs_balance()

2011-07-21 Thread Mark Fasheh
). Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com --- fs/btrfs/volumes.c |6 -- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c index 19450bc..530a2fc 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c @@ -2061,8 +2061,10 @@ int

[PATCH 4/7] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON alloc_path errors in btrfs_read_locked_inode

2011-07-21 Thread Mark Fasheh
btrfs_iget() also needed an update so that errors from btrfs_locked_inode() are caught and bubbled back up. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 22 +- 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs

[PATCH 6/7] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON alloc_path errors in find_next_chunk

2011-07-21 Thread Mark Fasheh
btrfs_alloc_chunk() which can now return -ENOMEM. Instead of setting space_info-full on any error from btrfs_alloc_chunk() I catch and return every error value _except_ -ENOSPC. Thanks goes to Tsutomu Itoh for pointing that issue out. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com --- fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c

Re: [PATCH 6/7] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON alloc_path errors in find_next_chunk

2011-07-18 Thread Mark Fasheh
don't think so actually. It looks like in this case we might want to bubble the error back up past do_chunk_alloc and leave space_info untouched. Chris, does that seem reasonable? --Mark -- Mark Fasheh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in the body

Re: [PATCH 7/7] btrfs: don't BUG_ON allocation errors in btrfs_drop_snapshot

2011-07-18 Thread Mark Fasheh
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 12:04:46PM +0900, Tsutomu Itoh wrote: (2011/07/15 7:15), Mark Fasheh wrote: In addition to properly handling allocation failure from btrfs_alloc_path, I also fixed up the kzalloc error handling code immediately below it. Need not you correct the caller

[PATCH 1/7] btrfs: don't BUG_ON btrfs_alloc_path() errors

2011-07-14 Thread Mark Fasheh
, btrfs_lookup_csums_range, btrfs_csum_file_blocks, btrfs_mark_extent_written, btrfs_inode_by_name, btrfs_new_inode, btrfs_symlink, insert_reserved_file_extent, and run_delalloc_nocow Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com --- fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 12 +--- fs/btrfs/file-item.c |7 +-- fs

Re: [PATCH 1/7] btrfs: don't BUG_ON btrfs_alloc_path() errors

2011-07-14 Thread Mark Fasheh
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 03:00:07PM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote: This patch fixes many callers of btrfs_alloc_path() which BUG_ON allocation failure. All the sites that are fixed in this patch were checked by me to be fairly trivial to fix because of at least one of two criteria: Please ignore

[PATCH 0/7] btrfs: don't BUG_ON btrfs_alloc_path errors

2011-07-14 Thread Mark Fasheh
Hi, The following patches attempt to replace all the paths where we BUG_ON the return value of btrfs_alloc_path with proper error handling. It's pretty clear that these places aren't BUGing because of code error. To be explicit, much of the code is doing something like this: path

[PATCH 1/7] btrfs: don't BUG_ON btrfs_alloc_path() errors

2011-07-14 Thread Mark Fasheh
, btrfs_lookup_csums_range, btrfs_csum_file_blocks, btrfs_mark_extent_written, btrfs_inode_by_name, btrfs_new_inode, btrfs_symlink, insert_reserved_file_extent, and run_delalloc_nocow Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com --- fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 12 +--- fs/btrfs/file-item.c |7 +-- fs

[PATCH 4/7] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON alloc_path errors in btrfs_read_locked_inode

2011-07-14 Thread Mark Fasheh
btrfs_iget() also needed an update so that errors from btrfs_locked_inode() are caught and bubbled back up. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 22 +- 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs

[PATCH 7/7] btrfs: don't BUG_ON allocation errors in btrfs_drop_snapshot

2011-07-14 Thread Mark Fasheh
In addition to properly handling allocation failure from btrfs_alloc_path, I also fixed up the kzalloc error handling code immediately below it. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com --- fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c |8 ++-- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git

[PATCH 6/7] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON alloc_path errors in find_next_chunk

2011-07-14 Thread Mark Fasheh
I also removed the BUG_ON from error return of find_next_chunk in init_first_rw_device(). It turns out that the only caller of init_first_rw_device() also BUGS on any nonzero return so no actual behavior change has occurred here. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com --- fs/btrfs/volumes.c

[PATCH 2/7] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON alloc_path errors in replay_one_buffer()

2011-07-14 Thread Mark Fasheh
The two -process_func call sites in tree-log.c which were ignoring a return code have also been updated to gracefully exit as well. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com --- fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 12 +--- 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs

[PATCH 3/7] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON alloc_path errors in btrfs_truncate_inode_items

2011-07-14 Thread Mark Fasheh
I moved the path allocation up a few lines to the top of the function so that we couldn't get into the state where we've dropped delayed items and the extent cache but fail due to -ENOMEM. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com --- fs/btrfs/inode.c |9 + 1 files changed, 5

[PATCH] btrfs: Remove BUG_ON's from btrfs_update_root

2011-06-28 Thread Mark Fasheh
. In order to maintain behavior I placed a BUG_ON clause there - at least though it's now at a higher level in the code. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com --- fs/btrfs/ioctl.c |1 + fs/btrfs/root-tree.c |6 -- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs

Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] vfs: allow /proc/pid/maps to return a custom device

2011-05-19 Thread Mark Fasheh
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 08:06:04PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com writes: This patch introduces a callback in the super_operations structure, 'get_maps_dev' which is then used by procfs to query which device to return for reporting in /proc/[PID]/maps

[RFC][PATCH 1/2] vfs: allow /proc/pid/maps to return a custom device

2011-05-13 Thread Mark Fasheh
This patch introduces a callback in the super_operations structure, 'get_maps_dev' which is then used by procfs to query which device to return for reporting in /proc/[PID]/maps. btrfs wants this so that it can return the same device as it uses from stat(2) calls. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas

[RFC][PATCH 2/2] Subject: btrfs: Introduce btrfs_get_maps_dev()

2011-05-13 Thread Mark Fasheh
Use this to return the subvolume superblock in proc instead of the global superblock which is automatically taken today. This fixes a userspace breakage where discrepancies between the devices two would confuse software such as lsof. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com --- fs/btrfs

Re: very poor read / write performance compared to other FS's?

2011-05-12 Thread Mark Fasheh
with a more recent kernel. --Mark -- Mark Fasheh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH] btrfs: return EXDEV when linking from different subvolumes

2011-03-22 Thread Mark Fasheh
points, but link() does not work across different mount points, even if the same file system is mounted on both.) This matters because an application may have different behaviors based on return codes. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com --- fs/btrfs/inode.c |2 +- 1

btrfs device returned from stat vs /proc/pid/maps

2011-03-21 Thread Mark Fasheh
the subvolumes device (via some callback I suppose)? Another alternative of course is to return the true block device in btrfs_getattr() but that has some obvious downsides too. Thanks and best regards, --Mark -- Mark Fasheh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux

[PATCH 2/2] btrfs: better error handling in xattr.c

2010-09-02 Thread Mark Fasheh
This was quite trivial - there's only 3 places I counted where we weren't handling errors. None of the sites looked like they needed any additional unrolling either. Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh mfas...@suse.com --- fs/btrfs/xattr.c |6 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions

<    1   2   3   4   5