Re: Btrfs fs not mounting or being identified after power loss.

2013-01-09 Thread Randy Barlow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/08/2013 10:46 PM, Jordan Windsor wrote: kernel is at 3.6.11-1-ARCH Sorry I don't know much to help you, but I would suggest perhaps using a newer kernel in the future. It sounds like your FS might be in trouble as is, but I would recommend

Re: Btrfs fs not mounting or being identified after power loss.

2013-01-08 Thread Randy Barlow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/08/2013 12:40 AM, Jordan Windsor wrote: If you need anymore information please ask. Kernel and btrfs-tools versions? - -- R -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -

Re: [RFC] New attempt to a better btrfs fi df

2012-10-29 Thread Randy Barlow
On 10/28/2012 03:06 PM, Michael Kjörling wrote: You_can_ calculate a worst case scenario figure (no compression possible on the new payload data), but that's about it. Well, there are those humorous edge cases where you compress a tiny amount of uncompressible data, and the compressed

Re: Moving top level to a subvolume

2012-06-12 Thread Randy Barlow
On Tuesday, June 12, 2012 01:53:23 AM Duncan wrote: We get a lot of folks on this list who somehow miss the kernel warning, and the wiki warning, and the general community knowledge, that btrfs is still marked experimental and is still under heavy development. If something goes wrong, as

Re: Bug in btrfs-debug-tree for two or more devices.

2012-06-12 Thread Randy Barlow
On Tuesday, June 12, 2012 06:53:00 AM Santosh Hosamani wrote: Kernel 3.0.13.0.27-default This kernel is very old for btrfs. Can you try with at least Linux 3.4? -- R -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org