Re: Linux 4.0.0-rc5 - [ 1851.858652] BTRFS: error (device sda1) in cleanup_transaction:1686: errno=-17 Object already exists

2015-03-31 Thread Torbjørn
On 03/31/2015 08:12 PM, Chris Mason wrote: On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Torbjørn li...@skagestad.org wrote: Hi, Just a follow up on this report. The file system in question is a raid1 across 2x320G old Western Digital WD3200KS. I janked them out of the server to run a fsck on another

Re: Linux 4.0.0-rc5 - [ 1851.858652] BTRFS: error (device sda1) in cleanup_transaction:1686: errno=-17 Object already exists

2015-03-30 Thread Torbjørn
value for some devs. As noted before: this (corrupted) fs only get errors when booting into 4.0-rc5. With 4.0-rc4 or earlier it works as if nothing is wrong. The output of btrfs check follows -- Torbjørn btrfs check /dev/sde1 warning, device 2 is missing warning devid 2 not found already

Re: Linux 4.0.0-rc5 - [ 1851.858652] BTRFS: error (device sda1) in cleanup_transaction:1686: errno=-17 Object already exists

2015-03-23 Thread Torbjørn Skagestad
On 23. mars 2015 13:36, Filipe David Manana wrote: On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Torbjørn li...@skagestad.org wrote: Hi, After upgrading to 4.0.0-rc5 from 4.0.0-rc4 I see Object already exists after reboot. The fs is forced read only. The error does not disappear after additional reboots

Re: Linux 4.0.0-rc5 - [ 1851.858652] BTRFS: error (device sda1) in cleanup_transaction:1686: errno=-17 Object already exists

2015-03-23 Thread Torbjørn Skagestad
On 23. mars 2015 13:32, Chris Mason wrote: On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 6:35 AM, Torbjørn li...@skagestad.org wrote: Hi, After upgrading to 4.0.0-rc5 from 4.0.0-rc4 I see Object already exists after reboot. The fs is forced read only. The error does not disappear after additional reboots

Re: Linux 4.0.0-rc5 - [ 1851.858652] BTRFS: error (device sda1) in cleanup_transaction:1686: errno=-17 Object already exists

2015-03-23 Thread Torbjørn
On 03/23/2015 02:50 PM, Torbjørn wrote: On 23. mars 2015 14:47, Chris Mason wrote: On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Torbjørn Skagestad torbj...@itpas.no wrote: On 23. mars 2015 13:36, Filipe David Manana wrote: On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Torbjørn li...@skagestad.org wrote: Hi, After

Re: Linux 4.0.0-rc5 - [ 1851.858652] BTRFS: error (device sda1) in cleanup_transaction:1686: errno=-17 Object already exists

2015-03-23 Thread Torbjørn
On 23. mars 2015 14:47, Chris Mason wrote: On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Torbjørn Skagestad torbj...@itpas.no wrote: On 23. mars 2015 13:36, Filipe David Manana wrote: On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Torbjørn li...@skagestad.org wrote: Hi, After upgrading to 4.0.0-rc5 from 4.0.0-rc4 I

Linux 4.0.0-rc5 - [ 1851.858652] BTRFS: error (device sda1) in cleanup_transaction:1686: errno=-17 Object already exists

2015-03-23 Thread Torbjørn
2 size 298.09GiB used 124.03GiB path /dev/sdd1 btrfs-progs v3.19 Any additional info I can provide? Tests you want me to run? -- Torbjørn [ 1851.856097] [ cut here ] [ 1851.856166] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 350 at fs/btrfs/super.c:260 __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x54/0x130

Re: 3.18.0-rc4 - WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 3889 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3785 btrfs_free_reserved_data_space+0xc8/0xe0 [btrfs]()

2014-11-21 Thread Torbjørn
On 12. nov. 2014 09:29, Torbjørn wrote: Hi, After upgrade to 3.18.0-rc4 get a lot of these warnings. The system seems to otherwise behave normally. I have not observed any actual issues. --snip-- Just to close off this email thread. After upgrading to 3.18.0-rc5 these messages have

3.18.0-rc4 - WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 3889 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3785 btrfs_free_reserved_data_space+0xc8/0xe0 [btrfs]()

2014-11-12 Thread Torbjørn
09:06:52 2014] [8108e160] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x180/0x180 [Wed Nov 12 09:06:52 2014] ---[ end trace db1dd7fa3d341df9 ]--- -- Torbjørn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info

Re: BTRFS hang with 3.16-rc5 (and also with 3.16-rc4)

2014-07-29 Thread Torbjørn
On 07/29/2014 12:18 PM, Liu Bo wrote: On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 01:11:19PM +0200, Torbjørn wrote: On 28. juli 2014 12:00, Liu Bo wrote: snip This seems to be incomplete(Looks like dmesg has reached its buffer size limit), does /var/log/message have the whole stack info? thanks, -liubo Hi

Re: BTRFS hang with 3.16-rc5 (and also with 3.16-rc4)

2014-07-28 Thread Torbjørn
to appear. If you want all the trailing log as well, let me know. https://gist.github.com/anonymous/7958d8917967f727f324 -- Torbjørn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http

Re: BTRFS hang with 3.16-rc5 (and also with 3.16-rc4)

2014-07-25 Thread Torbjørn
On 25. juli 2014 11:28, Liu Bo wrote: Hi Torbjørn, On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 06:51:44AM +0200, Torbjørn wrote: On 07/24/2014 04:58 PM, Chris Mason wrote: snip Liu Bo has a promising patch: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4618421/ Please give it a shot. There's a second deadlock reading

Re: BTRFS hang with 3.16-rc5 (and also with 3.16-rc4)

2014-07-25 Thread Torbjørn
On 25. juli 2014 13:09, Torbjørn wrote: On 25. juli 2014 12:22, Torbjørn wrote: On 25. juli 2014 11:28, Liu Bo wrote: Hi Torbjørn, On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 06:51:44AM +0200, Torbjørn wrote: On 07/24/2014 04:58 PM, Chris Mason wrote: snip Liu Bo has a promising patch: https

Re: BTRFS hang with 3.16-rc5 (and also with 3.16-rc4)

2014-07-25 Thread Torbjørn
On 07/25/2014 01:37 PM, Torbjørn wrote: On 25. juli 2014 13:09, Torbjørn wrote: On 25. juli 2014 12:22, Torbjørn wrote: On 25. juli 2014 11:28, Liu Bo wrote: Hi Torbjørn, On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 06:51:44AM +0200, Torbjørn wrote: On 07/24/2014 04:58 PM, Chris Mason wrote: snip Liu Bo has

Re: BTRFS hang with 3.16-rc5 (and also with 3.16-rc4)

2014-07-24 Thread Torbjørn
) still get hangs with this applied on top of 3.16-rc6. Looking forward to the free space cache patch. I have not been able to trigger the same hang as I had with 3.15 on any of the 3.16-rc6 kernels so far. -- Torbjørn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs

Re: Blocked tasks on 3.15.1

2014-07-22 Thread Torbjørn
have a nocow directory in a separate subvolume containing vm-images used by kvm. The same kvm-vms are reading/writing data from that array over nfs. I'm still holding that system on 3.14. Anything above causes blocks. -- Torbjørn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux

Re: Blocked tasks on 3.15.1

2014-07-22 Thread Torbjørn
- btrfs raid0 Hang was caused by 1. Several rsync -av --inplace --delete source backup subvol 2. btrfs subvolume snapshot -r backup subvol bacup snap The rsync jobs are done one at a time btrfs is stuck when trying to create the read only snapshot -- Torbjørn All output via netconsole. sysrq-w

Re: Blocked tasks on 3.15.1

2014-07-22 Thread Torbjørn
On 07/22/2014 09:50 PM, Chris Mason wrote: On 07/22/2014 03:42 PM, Torbjørn wrote: On 07/22/2014 04:53 PM, Chris Mason wrote: On 07/19/2014 02:23 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote: Running 3.15.6 with this patch applied on top: - still causes a hang with `rsync -hPaHAXx --del /mnt/home/nyx

Re: BTRFS claims that empty directory is not empty and refuses to delete it

2014-07-15 Thread Torbjørn
sure it is a directory? -- Torbjørn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: 3.15-rc6 - btrfs-transacti:4157 blocked for more than 120 seconds.

2014-06-02 Thread Torbjørn
On 01. juni 2014 23:29, Marc MERLIN wrote: On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 04:56:56PM +0200, Torbjørn wrote: On 05/28/2014 03:41 PM, Chris Mason wrote: On 05/28/2014 01:53 AM, Torbjørn wrote: It's actually a raid10 array of 11 dm-crypt devices. I'm able to read data from the array (accessing files

Re: 3.15-rc6 - btrfs-transacti:4157 blocked for more than 120 seconds.

2014-05-28 Thread Torbjørn
On 05/28/2014 03:41 PM, Chris Mason wrote: On 05/28/2014 01:53 AM, Torbjørn wrote: It's actually a raid10 array of 11 dm-crypt devices. I'm able to read data from the array (accessing files), and also read directly from all the underlying dm-crypt devices using dd, if that's what you meant. I

3.15-rc6 - btrfs-transacti:4157 blocked for more than 120 seconds.

2014-05-27 Thread Torbjørn
to help? Tests you want me to run? -- Torbjørn --snip-- [138011.263478] INFO: task btrfs-transacti:4157 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [138011.263558] Tainted: GE 3.15.0-rc6 #58 [138011.263605] echo 0 /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs disables this message

Re: 3.15-rc6 - btrfs-transacti:4157 blocked for more than 120 seconds.

2014-05-27 Thread Torbjørn
On 05/27/2014 10:08 PM, Torbjørn wrote: On 05/27/2014 09:09 PM, Chris Mason wrote: On 05/27/2014 02:11 PM, Torbjørn wrote: Hi, Btrfs-transaction keeps blocking for me on all 3.15-rc versions. 3.14 does not have this issue. The process never gets unstuck. btrfs fi sync does not help. A hard

Re: 3.15-rc6 - btrfs-transacti:4157 blocked for more than 120 seconds.

2014-05-27 Thread Torbjørn
On 27. mai 2014 23:15, Chris Mason wrote: On 05/27/2014 04:50 PM, Chris Mason wrote: On 05/27/2014 04:42 PM, Torbjørn wrote: On 05/27/2014 10:08 PM, Torbjørn wrote: On 05/27/2014 09:09 PM, Chris Mason wrote: On 05/27/2014 02:11 PM, Torbjørn wrote: Hi, Btrfs-transaction keeps blocking

Re: Is the checkpoint interval adjustable?

2013-08-03 Thread Torbjørn
majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Just curious: What would be the benefit of increasing the checkpoint interval? Laptops typically spin down disks to save power. If btrfs forces a write every 30 second, you have to spin it back up. -- Torbjørn As far as I understood

Re: Scrub causes oom after removal of failed disk (linux 3.10)

2013-07-08 Thread Torbjørn Skagestad
On 07/08/2013 11:36 PM, David Sterba wrote: On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 08:35:48PM +0200, Torbjørn wrote: Hi btrfs devs, I have a btrfs raid10 array consisting of 2TB drives. I added a new drive to the array, then balanced. The balance failed after ~50GB was moved to the new drive. The balance

Scrub causes oom after removal of failed disk (linux 3.10)

2013-07-03 Thread Torbjørn
[68202.907369] CR2: 87f7e1868ca0 [68202.938196] ---[ end trace ad5eb9d56280bbec ]--- -- Torbjørn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html