From: Filipe Manana
The log tree has a long standing problem that when a file is fsync'ed we
only check for new ancestors, created in the current transaction, by
following only the hard link for which the fsync was issued. We follow the
ancestors using the VFS' dget_parent() API. This means that
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 2:22 PM David Sterba wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 08:10:30PM +, Filipe Manana wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 6:17 PM David Sterba wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 06:25:40PM +, fdman...@kernel.org wrote:
> > > > From: Filipe Manana
> > > >
> >
From: Filipe Manana
The log tree has a long standing problem that when a file is fsync'ed we
only check for new ancestors, created in the current transaction, by
following only the hard link for which the fsync was issued. We follow the
ancestors using the VFS' dget_parent() API. This means that
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 08:10:30PM +, Filipe Manana wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 6:17 PM David Sterba wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 06:25:40PM +, fdman...@kernel.org wrote:
> > > From: Filipe Manana
> > >
> > > When a transaction commit starts, it attempts to pause scrub and
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 11:21:12AM +0800, Su Yue wrote:
> In function do_trimming(), block_group->lock should be unlocked first.
Please also write why this is correct and if there are any bad
consequences of the current behaviour. Thanks.
On 2018/11/28 下午3:20, Mikko Merikivi wrote:
> Well, excuse me for thinking it wouldn't since in md-raid it worked.
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/RAID#RAID_level_comparison
>
> Anyway, the error message is truly confusing for someone who doesn't
> know about btrfs's implementation. I
On 2018/11/28 下午9:25, David Sterba wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 09:33:50AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> On 2018/11/28 上午3:53, David Sterba wrote:
>>> This is motivated by a merging mistake that happened a few releases ago.
>>> Two patches updated BTRFS_FS_* flags independently to the same
On 28.11.18 г. 15:24 ч., Brendan Hide wrote:
>
>
> On 11/28/18 1:23 PM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 28.11.18 г. 13:05 ч., Andrea Gelmini wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrea Gelmini
>>> ---
>
>
>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
>>> index
On 11/28/18 1:23 PM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
On 28.11.18 г. 13:05 ч., Andrea Gelmini wrote:
Signed-off-by: Andrea Gelmini
---
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index bab2f1983c07..babbd75d91d2 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn
--
Johannes ThumshirnSUSE Labs Filesystems
jthumsh...@suse.de+49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn
--
Johannes ThumshirnSUSE Labs Filesystems
jthumsh...@suse.de+49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn
--
Johannes ThumshirnSUSE Labs Filesystems
jthumsh...@suse.de+49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn
--
Johannes ThumshirnSUSE Labs Filesystems
jthumsh...@suse.de+49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn
--
Johannes ThumshirnSUSE Labs Filesystems
jthumsh...@suse.de+49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 09:33:50AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> On 2018/11/28 上午3:53, David Sterba wrote:
> > This is motivated by a merging mistake that happened a few releases ago.
> > Two patches updated BTRFS_FS_* flags independently to the same value,
> > git did not see any direct merge
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 04:37:16PM -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 08:53:55PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> > We can use simple enum for values that are not part of on-disk format:
> > tree lock types.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Sterba
> > ---
> > fs/btrfs/locking.h | 10
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn
--
Johannes ThumshirnSUSE Labs Filesystems
jthumsh...@suse.de+49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn
--
Johannes ThumshirnSUSE Labs Filesystems
jthumsh...@suse.de+49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG
Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn
--
Johannes ThumshirnSUSE Labs
jthumsh...@suse.de+49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG
Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn
--
Johannes ThumshirnSUSE Labs
jthumsh...@suse.de+49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG
On 28.11.18 г. 13:05 ч., Andrea Gelmini wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Gelmini
> ---
>
> Stupid fixes. Made on 4.20-rc4, and ported on linux-next (next-20181128).
>
>
> fs/btrfs/backref.c | 4 ++--
> fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c | 2 +-
> fs/btrfs/compression.c | 4 ++--
>
Signed-off-by: Andrea Gelmini
---
Stupid fixes. Made on 4.20-rc4, and ported on linux-next (next-20181128).
fs/btrfs/backref.c | 4 ++--
fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c | 2 +-
fs/btrfs/compression.c | 4 ++--
fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 4 ++--
fs/btrfs/dev-replace.c | 2 +-
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 9:26 AM Lu Fengqi wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 09:48:07AM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> >
> >
> >On 28.11.18 г. 9:46 ч., Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 09:44:59AM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 28.11.18 г. 5:07 ч., Lu
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 09:01:42AM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>
>
>On 28.11.18 г. 5:21 ч., Lu Fengqi wrote:
>> The @found is always false when it comes to the if branch. Besides, the
>> bool type is more suitable for @found.
>
>Well if you are ranging the type of found variable it also makes
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 09:48:07AM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>
>
>On 28.11.18 г. 9:46 ч., Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 09:44:59AM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 28.11.18 г. 5:07 ч., Lu Fengqi wrote:
The generic/513 tell that cloning into a file did not
On 11/28/18 4:24 PM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
On 28.11.18 г. 5:11 ч., Su Yue wrote:
To implement priority aware allocator, this patch:
Introduces struct btrfs_priority_tree which contains block groups
in same level.
Adds member priority to struct btrfs_block_group_cache and pointer
points to
On 28.11.18 г. 10:54 ч., Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> Document why map_private_extent_buffer() cannot return '1' (i.e. the map
> spans two pages) for the csum_tree_block() case.
>
> The current algorithm for detecting a page boundary crossing in
> map_private_extent_buffer() will return a '1'
On 28.11.18 г. 5:11 ч., Su Yue wrote:
> Introduce compute_block_group_usage() and compute_block_group_usage().
> And call the latter in btrfs_make_block_group() and
> btrfs_read_block_groups().
>
> compute_priority_level use ilog2(free) to compute priority level.
>
> Signed-off-by: Su Yue
>
Document why map_private_extent_buffer() cannot return '1' (i.e. the map
spans two pages) for the csum_tree_block() case.
The current algorithm for detecting a page boundary crossing in
map_private_extent_buffer() will return a '1' *IFF* the extent buffer's
offset in the page + the offset passed
In map_private_extent_buffer() the 'offset' variable is initialized to a
page aligned version of the 'start' parameter.
But later on it is overwritten with either the offset from the extent
buffer's start or 0.
So get rid of the initial initialization.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn
In map_private_extent_buffer() use offset_in_page() to initialize
'start_offset' instead of open-coding it.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov
---
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
While trying to understand the checksum code I came across some oddities
regarding map_private_extent_buffer() and it's interaction with
csum_tree_block().
These patches address them but are either purely cosmetic or only add a
comment documenting behaviour.
Changes to v1:
* Add Reviewed-by tags
On 11/26/2018 05:59 PM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
On 26.11.18 г. 11:07 ч., Anand Jain wrote:
Circular locking dependency check reports warning[1], that's because
the btrfs_scrub_dev() calls the stack #0 below with, the
fs_info::scrub_lock held. The test case leading to this warning..
On 27/11/2018 17:36, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>
>
> On 27.11.18 г. 18:00 ч., Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
>> Document why map_private_extent_buffer() cannot return '1' (i.e. the map
>> spans two pages) for the csum_tree_block() case.
>>
>> The current algorithm for detecting a page boundary crossing
On 28.11.18 г. 5:11 ч., Su Yue wrote:
> To implement priority aware allocator, this patch:
> Introduces struct btrfs_priority_tree which contains block groups
> in same level.
> Adds member priority to struct btrfs_block_group_cache and pointer
> points to the priority tree it's located.
>
>
On 27.11.18 г. 21:46 ч., Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 02:25:52PM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 21.11.18 г. 21:03 ч., Josef Bacik wrote:
>>> With the introduction of the per-inode block_rsv it became possible to
>>> have really really large reservation requests made
On 28.11.18 г. 9:46 ч., Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 09:44:59AM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 28.11.18 г. 5:07 ч., Lu Fengqi wrote:
>>> The generic/513 tell that cloning into a file did not strip security
>>> privileges (suid, capabilities) like a regular write
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 09:44:59AM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>
>
> On 28.11.18 г. 5:07 ч., Lu Fengqi wrote:
> > The generic/513 tell that cloning into a file did not strip security
> > privileges (suid, capabilities) like a regular write would.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi
> > ---
> >
On 28.11.18 г. 5:07 ч., Lu Fengqi wrote:
> The generic/513 tell that cloning into a file did not strip security
> privileges (suid, capabilities) like a regular write would.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi
> ---
> The xfs and ocfs2 call generic_remap_file_range_prep to drop file
> privileges,
Well, excuse me for thinking it wouldn't since in md-raid it worked.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/RAID#RAID_level_comparison
Anyway, the error message is truly confusing for someone who doesn't
know about btrfs's implementation. I suppose in md-raid the near
layout is actually RAID 1 and
On 28.11.18 г. 5:21 ч., Su Yue wrote:
> In function do_trimming(), block_group->lock should be unlocked first.
>
> Fixes: 7fe1e6415026 ("Btrfs: rewrite btrfs_trim_block_group()")
> Signed-off-by: Su Yue
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov
> ---
> fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c | 2 +-
> 1 file
On 28.11.18 г. 5:23 ч., Lu Fengqi wrote:
> The generic_write_checks will check the combination of IOCB_NOWAIT and
> !IOCB_DIRECT.
True, however btrfs will return ENOSUPP whereas the generic code returns
EINVAL. I guess this is not a big deal and it's likely generic code is
correct, so:
On 28.11.18 г. 5:21 ч., Lu Fengqi wrote:
> The @found is always false when it comes to the if branch. Besides, the
> bool type is more suitable for @found.
Well if you are ranging the type of found variable it also makes sense
to change the return value of the function to bool as well.
>
>
On 28.11.18 г. 5:22 ч., Lu Fengqi wrote:
> When it is introduced at commit f094ac32aba3 ("Btrfs: fix NULL pointer
> after aborting a transaction"), it's useless.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov
> ---
> fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
The biggest challenge for qgroup to skip reloc tree extents is to detect
correct owner of reloc tree blocks owner.
Unlike most data operations, the root of tree reloc tree can't be
easily detected.
For example, for relocation we call btrfs_copy_root to init reloc tree:
btrfs_copy_root(root=257,
On 2018/11/28 上午11:11, Su Yue wrote:
> This patchset can be fetched from repo:
> https://github.com/Damenly/btrfs-devel/commits/priority_aware_allocator.
> Since patchset 'btrfs: Refactor find_free_extent()' does a nice work
> to simplify find_free_extent(). This patchset dependents on the
The generic_write_checks will check the combination of IOCB_NOWAIT and
!IOCB_DIRECT.
Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi
---
fs/btrfs/file.c | 4
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c
index 3835bb8c146d..190db9a685a2 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
+++
When it is introduced at commit f094ac32aba3 ("Btrfs: fix NULL pointer
after aborting a transaction"), it's useless.
Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi
---
fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
index
The @found is always false when it comes to the if branch. Besides, the
bool type is more suitable for @found.
Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi
---
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 7 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index
In function do_trimming(), block_group->lock should be unlocked first.
Fixes: 7fe1e6415026 ("Btrfs: rewrite btrfs_trim_block_group()")
Signed-off-by: Su Yue
---
fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c
The generic/513 tell that cloning into a file did not strip security
privileges (suid, capabilities) like a regular write would.
Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi
---
The xfs and ocfs2 call generic_remap_file_range_prep to drop file
privileges, I'm not sure whether btrfs should do the same thing.
Any
In origin, find_free_extent() just searches block groups in space_info
one by one.
In priority aware allocator, we first search block groups in
higher priority tree than in lower priority tree.
This helper unify above two ways for further use.
Signed-off-by: Su Yue
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
If use priority aware allocator, bg->priority_tree->groups_sem should
be written instead of space_info->groups_sem.
Signed-off-by: Su Yue
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 60 +++---
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git
Introduce btrfs_update_block_group_priority() to update
block_groups::priority. It will move block group from old tree
to new tree if need.
Signed-off-by: Su Yue
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 76 ++
1 file changed, 76 insertions(+)
diff --git
Introduce create_priority_trees() to create priority trees in
space_info.
Introduce remove_priority_trees() to remove priority trees in
space_info.
Signed-off-by: Su Yue
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 94 ++
1 file changed, 94 insertions(+)
diff --git
Add mount option "priority_alloc=%s", now %s only supports "usage" and
"off". The latter is used for remount.
"priority_alloc=usage" will active priority aware allocator.
This mount option changes the way of find_free_extent to search
block groups and may cost more time.
Signed-off-by: Su Yue
Add member priority_tree to find_free_extent_ctl to represents the
tree using.
Modify find_free_extent to use find_free_extent_search, so it can
work in default mount option and priorit aware allocator.
Signed-off-by: Su Yue
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 114
In origin design, the order of space_info::block_groups is changed only
when add/remove block group(s).
In design of priority aware allocator, block groups may be moved from
one priority tree to another one. What the operation is usually that
1) lock block_group
down_write first_tree
Introduce compute_block_group_usage() and compute_block_group_usage().
And call the latter in btrfs_make_block_group() and
btrfs_read_block_groups().
compute_priority_level use ilog2(free) to compute priority level.
Signed-off-by: Su Yue
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 60
Export btrfs_remove_block_group_priority() to header ctree.h.
Call btrfs_remove_block_group_priority() while deleting
transaction->deleted_bgs, btrfs_free_block_groups() and
btrfs_remove_block_group().
Signed-off-by: Su Yue
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 1 +
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 3 +++
Now implementation of priority allocator only support usage option.
Add BTRFS_MOUNT_PRIORITY_USAGE for further commits.
Signed-off-by: Su Yue
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
index 5c4651d8a524..4c56baf9f7cf 100644
---
Since if use priority alloc, we should down/up_write()
bg->priority_groups_sem.
Signed-off-by: Su Yue
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 10 --
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index f530a4344368..6627bbe56ad5 100644
Add block group to priority tree in btrfs_read_block_groups()
and btrfs_make_block_groups().
Signed-off-by: Su Yue
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index 2dec02782df1..fc40901b4772 100644
---
For usage as priority, the varaiables in block groups we concered are
reserved, bytes_super and btrfs_block_group_used(>item).
This patch calls btrfs_set_bg_updating() in locations where above three
varaiables changed to mark block groups needs to be updated, then
calls btrfs_update_block_group()
Introduce compute_priority_level() to compute priority level according
priority, now just divides PRIORITY_USAGE_FACOTR.
Introduce add_block_group_priority() to add block groups to
priority tree.
Signed-off-by: Su Yue
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 76 ++
Introduce btrfs_remove_block_group_priority() to remove block group
from priority tree.
Signed-off-by: Su Yue
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 37 +
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index
Call create_priority_trees() in create_space_info().
Call remove_priority_trees() before free of space_info.
Signed-off-by: Su Yue
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 21 +
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
To implement priority aware allocator, this patch:
Introduces struct btrfs_priority_tree which contains block groups
in same level.
Adds member priority to struct btrfs_block_group_cache and pointer
points to the priority tree it's located.
Adds member priority_trees to struct btrfs_space_info to
This patchset can be fetched from repo:
https://github.com/Damenly/btrfs-devel/commits/priority_aware_allocator.
Since patchset 'btrfs: Refactor find_free_extent()' does a nice work
to simplify find_free_extent(). This patchset dependents on the refactor.
The base is the commit in kdave/misc-next:
On 2018/11/28 上午3:53, David Sterba wrote:
> The first auto-assigned value to enum is 0, we can use that and not
> initialize all members where the auto-increment does the same. This is
> used for values that are not part of on-disk format.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba
Reviewed-by: Qu
On 2018/11/28 上午3:53, David Sterba wrote:
> This is motivated by a merging mistake that happened a few releases ago.
> Two patches updated BTRFS_FS_* flags independently to the same value,
> git did not see any direct merge conflict. The two values got mixed at
> runtime and caused crash.
>
>
On 2018/11/28 上午3:53, David Sterba wrote:
> We can use simple enum for values that are not part of on-disk format:
> ordered extent flags.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo
Thanks,
Qu
> ---
> fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h | 45 +++--
> 1
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Steigerwald [mailto:mar...@lichtvoll.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2018 6:48 PM
> To: Misono, Tomohiro
> Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/8] btrfs-progs: sub: Relax the privileges
> of "subvolume list/show"
>
>
On 2018/11/28 上午3:53, David Sterba wrote:
> We can use simple enum for values that are not part of on-disk format:
> tree lock types.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo
Thanks,
Qu
> ---
> fs/btrfs/locking.h | 10 ++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4
On 2018/11/28 上午3:53, David Sterba wrote:
> We can use simple enum for values that are not part of on-disk format:
> extent map flags.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo
Thanks,
Qu
> ---
> fs/btrfs/extent_map.h | 21 ++---
> 1 file changed, 14
On 2018/11/28 上午3:53, David Sterba wrote:
> We can use simple enum for values that are not part of on-disk format:
> extent buffer flags;
>
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo
Thanks,
Qu
> ---
> fs/btrfs/extent_io.h | 28
> 1 file changed, 16
On 2018/11/28 上午3:53, David Sterba wrote:
> We can use simple enum for values that are not part of on-disk format:
> root tree flags.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo
Thanks,
Qu
> ---
> fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 33 +
> 1 file changed, 17
On 2018/11/28 上午3:53, David Sterba wrote:
> We can use simple enum for values that are not part of on-disk format:
> internal filesystem states.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo
Thanks,
Qu
> ---
> fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 63
On 2018/11/28 上午3:53, David Sterba wrote:
> We can use simple enum for values that are not part of on-disk format:
> block reserve types.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo
However more comment will always be a good thing.
Thanks,
Qu
> ---
> fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 19
On 2018/11/28 上午3:53, David Sterba wrote:
> We can use simple enum for values that are not part of on-disk format:
> global filesystem states.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba
Good comment.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo
Thanks,
Qu
> ---
> fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 25 +++--
> 1 file
On 2018/11/28 上午5:16, Mikko Merikivi wrote:
> I seem unable to convert an existing btrfs device array to RAID 10.
> Since it's pretty much RAID 0 and 1 combined, and 5 and 6 are
> unstable, it's what I would like to use.
>
> After I did tried this with 4.19.2-arch1-1-ARCH and btrfs-progs v4.19,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 08:53:59PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> The first auto-assigned value to enum is 0, we can use that and not
> initialize all members where the auto-increment does the same. This is
> used for values that are not part of on-disk format.
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval
>
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 08:53:57PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> We can use simple enum for values that are not part of on-disk format:
> ordered extent flags.
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba
> ---
> fs/btrfs/ordered-data.h | 45
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 08:53:55PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> We can use simple enum for values that are not part of on-disk format:
> tree lock types.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba
> ---
> fs/btrfs/locking.h | 10 ++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 08:53:52PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> We can use simple enum for values that are not part of on-disk format:
> extent map flags.
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba
> ---
> fs/btrfs/extent_map.h | 21 ++---
> 1 file changed, 14
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 08:53:50PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> We can use simple enum for values that are not part of on-disk format:
> extent buffer flags;
This one has a "swtich" typo in the subject. Otherwise,
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba
> ---
>
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 08:53:48PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> We can use simple enum for values that are not part of on-disk format:
> root tree flags.
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba
> ---
> fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 33 +
> 1 file changed,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 08:53:45PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> We can use simple enum for values that are not part of on-disk format:
> internal filesystem states.
Hah, looks like we never had a bit 0 ;)
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba
> ---
> fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 63
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 08:53:43PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> We can use simple enum for values that are not part of on-disk format:
> block reserve types.
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba
> ---
> fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 19 ---
> 1 file changed, 12
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 08:53:41PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> We can use simple enum for values that are not part of on-disk format:
> global filesystem states.
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval
Some typos/wording suggestions below.
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba
> ---
> fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 25
I seem unable to convert an existing btrfs device array to RAID 10.
Since it's pretty much RAID 0 and 1 combined, and 5 and 6 are
unstable, it's what I would like to use.
After I did tried this with 4.19.2-arch1-1-ARCH and btrfs-progs v4.19,
I updated my system and tried btrfs balance again with
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 2:32 PM Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>
> On 27.11.18 г. 21:08 ч., Noah Massey wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 11:43 AM Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> >>
> >> On 27.11.18 г. 18:00 ч., Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> >>> Document why map_private_extent_buffer() cannot return '1' (i.e.
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 07:59:42PM +, Chris Mason wrote:
> On 27 Nov 2018, at 14:54, Josef Bacik wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 10:26:15AM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 21.11.18 г. 21:09 ч., Josef Bacik wrote:
> >>> The cleaner thread usually takes care of delayed
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 10:29:57AM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>
>
> On 21.11.18 г. 21:09 ч., Josef Bacik wrote:
> > The throttle path doesn't take cleaner_delayed_iput_mutex, which means
>
> Which one is the throttle path? btrfs_end_transaction_throttle is only
> called during snapshot drop
On 27 Nov 2018, at 14:54, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 10:26:15AM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 21.11.18 г. 21:09 ч., Josef Bacik wrote:
>>> The cleaner thread usually takes care of delayed iputs, with the
>>> exception of the btrfs_end_transaction_throttle path. The
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 07:43:39PM +, Filipe Manana wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 7:22 PM Josef Bacik wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 04:59:32PM +, Filipe Manana wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 12:35 AM Josef Bacik wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I noticed in a giant dbench run
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 10:26:15AM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>
>
> On 21.11.18 г. 21:09 ч., Josef Bacik wrote:
> > The cleaner thread usually takes care of delayed iputs, with the
> > exception of the btrfs_end_transaction_throttle path. The cleaner
> > thread only gets woken up every 30
The first auto-assigned value to enum is 0, we can use that and not
initialize all members where the auto-increment does the same. This is
used for values that are not part of on-disk format.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba
---
fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h | 2 +-
fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 28
We can use simple enum for values that are not part of on-disk format:
root tree flags.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 33 +
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
index
We can use simple enum for values that are not part of on-disk format:
internal filesystem states.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 63
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
301 - 400 of 77199 matches
Mail list logo
