Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix regression in re-setting a large xattr

2011-10-14 Thread Josef Bacik
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 09:04:28AM +0900, Tsutomu Itoh wrote: (2011/10/14 2:11), Josef Bacik wrote: Recently I changed the xattr stuff to unconditionally set the xattr first in case the xattr didn't exist yet. This has introduced a regression when setting an xattr that already exists

[PATCH] Btrfs: fix regression in re-setting a large xattr V2

2011-10-14 Thread Josef Bacik
Recently I changed the xattr stuff to unconditionally set the xattr first in case the xattr didn't exist yet. This has introduced a regression when setting an xattr that already exists with a large value. If we find the key we are looking for split_leaf will assume that we're extending that

[PATCH] Btrfs: fix regression in re-setting a large xattr

2011-10-13 Thread Josef Bacik
Recently I changed the xattr stuff to unconditionally set the xattr first in case the xattr didn't exist yet. This has introduced a regression when setting an xattr that already exists with a large value. If we find the key we are looking for split_leaf will assume that we're extending that

Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix regression in re-setting a large xattr

2011-10-13 Thread Tsutomu Itoh
(2011/10/14 2:11), Josef Bacik wrote: Recently I changed the xattr stuff to unconditionally set the xattr first in case the xattr didn't exist yet. This has introduced a regression when setting an xattr that already exists with a large value. If we find the key we are looking for