Whoever wrote this was braindead. Also it doesn't work right if you have
VACANCY's since we assumed you would only have that at the end of the file,
which won't be the case in the near future. I tested this with generic/285 and
generic/286 as well as the btrfs tests that use fssum since it uses
s
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:11:15PM +0600, Roman Mamedov wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Oct 2013 11:48:21 -0400
> Josef Bacik wrote:
>
> > Whoever wrote this was braindead.
>
> You do realize you sent a number of people googling for "Delalloc is such a
> pain. If we have a hole and we have pending" just out
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:11:15PM +0600, Roman Mamedov wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Oct 2013 11:48:21 -0400
> Josef Bacik wrote:
>
> > Whoever wrote this was braindead.
>
> You do realize you sent a number of people googling for "Delalloc is such a
> pain. If we have a hole and we have pending" just out
On Fri, 18 Oct 2013 11:48:21 -0400
Josef Bacik wrote:
> Whoever wrote this was braindead.
You do realize you sent a number of people googling for "Delalloc is such a
pain. If we have a hole and we have pending" just out of curiosity? :))
--
With respect,
Roman
signature.asc
Description: PGP
Whoever wrote this was braindead. Also it doesn't work right if you have
VACANCY's since we assumed you would only have that at the end of the file,
which won't be the case in the near future. I tested this with generic/285 and
generic/286 as well as the btrfs tests that use fssum since it uses
s