On 08/01/2011 09:43 PM, liubo wrote:
On 08/02/2011 09:32 AM, liubo wrote:
On 08/02/2011 12:11 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
We always look for delalloc bytes in our io_tree so we can fill in delalloc.
This is fine in most cases, but if we're writing out the btree_inode this is
just a superfluous
We always look for delalloc bytes in our io_tree so we can fill in delalloc.
This is fine in most cases, but if we're writing out the btree_inode this is
just a superfluous tree search on the io_tree, and if we have a lot of metadata
dirty this could be an expensive check. So instead check to see
On 08/02/2011 12:11 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
We always look for delalloc bytes in our io_tree so we can fill in delalloc.
This is fine in most cases, but if we're writing out the btree_inode this is
just a superfluous tree search on the io_tree, and if we have a lot of
metadata
dirty this
On 08/02/2011 09:32 AM, liubo wrote:
On 08/02/2011 12:11 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
We always look for delalloc bytes in our io_tree so we can fill in delalloc.
This is fine in most cases, but if we're writing out the btree_inode this is
just a superfluous tree search on the io_tree, and if we
