On 06/12/2011 09:52 PM, Li Zefan wrote:
Josef Bacik wrote:
We used to store the checksums of the space cache directly in the space
cache,
however that doesn't work out too well if we have more space than we can fit
the
checksums into the first page. So instead use the normal checksumming
We used to store the checksums of the space cache directly in the space cache,
however that doesn't work out too well if we have more space than we can fit the
checksums into the first page. So instead use the normal checksumming
infrastructure. There were problems with doing this originally but
Excerpts from Li Zefan's message of 2011-06-12 22:20:43 -0400:
Chris Mason wrote:
Excerpts from Li Zefan's message of 2011-06-12 21:52:32 -0400:
Josef Bacik wrote:
We used to store the checksums of the space cache directly in the space
cache,
however that doesn't work out too well if
On 06/13/2011 10:11 AM, Chris Mason wrote:
Excerpts from Li Zefan's message of 2011-06-12 22:20:43 -0400:
Chris Mason wrote:
Excerpts from Li Zefan's message of 2011-06-12 21:52:32 -0400:
Josef Bacik wrote:
We used to store the checksums of the space cache directly in the space
cache,
We used to store the checksums of the space cache directly in the space cache,
however that doesn't work out too well if we have more space than we can fit the
checksums into the first page. So instead use the normal checksumming
infrastructure. There were problems with doing this originally but
Josef Bacik wrote:
We used to store the checksums of the space cache directly in the space cache,
however that doesn't work out too well if we have more space than we can fit
the
checksums into the first page. So instead use the normal checksumming
infrastructure. There were problems with
Excerpts from Li Zefan's message of 2011-06-12 21:52:32 -0400:
Josef Bacik wrote:
We used to store the checksums of the space cache directly in the space
cache,
however that doesn't work out too well if we have more space than we can
fit the
checksums into the first page. So instead
Chris Mason wrote:
Excerpts from Li Zefan's message of 2011-06-12 21:52:32 -0400:
Josef Bacik wrote:
We used to store the checksums of the space cache directly in the space
cache,
however that doesn't work out too well if we have more space than we can
fit the
checksums into the first
Li Zefan wrote:
Chris Mason wrote:
Excerpts from Li Zefan's message of 2011-06-12 21:52:32 -0400:
Josef Bacik wrote:
We used to store the checksums of the space cache directly in the space
cache,
however that doesn't work out too well if we have more space than we can
fit the
checksums
Chris Mason wrote:
Excerpts from Li Zefan's message of 2011-06-12 21:52:32 -0400:
Josef Bacik wrote:
We used to store the checksums of the space cache directly in the space
cache,
however that doesn't work out too well if we have more space than we can
fit the
checksums into the first
We used to store the checksums of the space cache directly in the space cache,
however that doesn't work out too well if we have more space than we can fit the
checksums into the first page. So instead use the normal checksumming
infrastructure. There were problems with doing this originally but
11 matches
Mail list logo
