Hi Dave,
On 01/14/2014 11:27 PM, David Sterba wrote:
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 02:52:27PM +, Chris Mason wrote:
You may need to upgrade the kernel to get new features offered by a
new userspace, but I think we should absolutely not be changing
userspace in a way that makes it
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 02:52:27PM +, Chris Mason wrote:
You may need to upgrade the kernel to get new features offered by a
new userspace, but I think we should absolutely not be changing
userspace in a way that makes it incompatible with older kernels.
I'd really prefer that we
Some users complaint that with latest btrfs-progs, they will
fail to use send/receive. The problem is new tool will try
to use uuid tree while it dosen't work on older kernel.
Now we first check if we support uuid tree, if not we fall into
normal search as previous way.i copy most of codes from
On Thu, 9 Jan 2014 18:52:38 +0800, Wang Shilong wrote:
Some users complaint that with latest btrfs-progs, they will
fail to use send/receive. The problem is new tool will try
to use uuid tree while it dosen't work on older kernel.
Now we first check if we support uuid tree, if not we fall
Hi Stefan,
On 01/09/2014 07:49 PM, Stefan Behrens wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jan 2014 18:52:38 +0800, Wang Shilong wrote:
Some users complaint that with latest btrfs-progs, they will
fail to use send/receive. The problem is new tool will try
to use uuid tree while it dosen't work on older kernel.
Now
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 12:49:48PM +0100, Stefan Behrens wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jan 2014 18:52:38 +0800, Wang Shilong wrote:
Some users complaint that with latest btrfs-progs, they will
fail to use send/receive. The problem is new tool will try
to use uuid tree while it dosen't work on older
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 12:16 +, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 12:49:48PM +0100, Stefan Behrens wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jan 2014 18:52:38 +0800, Wang Shilong wrote:
Some users complaint that with latest btrfs-progs, they will
fail to use send/receive. The problem is new tool will
