Hi,
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 01:46:33PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
My big complaint about this patch is that it is a feature fix mixed in
with a huge cleanup. It's hard to differentiate between the two. Could
you please separate it out so we can review them independently?
I agree that changes
On 08.02.2011 19:03, Arne Jansen wrote:
In a multi device setup, the chunk allocator currently always allocates
chunks on the devices in the same order. This leads to a very uneven
distribution, especially with RAID1 or RAID10 and an uneven number of
devices.
This patch always sorts the device
Excerpts from Arne Jansen's message of 2011-04-11 13:42:49 -0400:
On 08.02.2011 19:03, Arne Jansen wrote:
In a multi device setup, the chunk allocator currently always allocates
chunks on the devices in the same order. This leads to a very uneven
distribution, especially with RAID1 or
Excerpts from Arne Jansen's message of 2011-03-17 11:58:46 -0400:
On 09.02.2011 04:03, Miao Xie wrote:
On tue, 8 Feb 2011 19:03:32 +0100, Arne Jansen wrote:
In a multi device setup, the chunk allocator currently always allocates
chunks on the devices in the same order. This leads to a
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com wrote:
I think that filling all the devices fully is more important than the
initial spread. Miao is correct that the administrator will
probably complain if all the devices aren't used for the initial stripes.
But, over the
On 18.03.2011 17:25, cwillu wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Chris Masonchris.ma...@oracle.com wrote:
I think that filling all the devices fully is more important than the
initial spread. Miao is correct that the administrator will
probably complain if all the devices aren't used for
On 09.02.2011 04:03, Miao Xie wrote:
On tue, 8 Feb 2011 19:03:32 +0100, Arne Jansen wrote:
In a multi device setup, the chunk allocator currently always allocates
chunks on the devices in the same order. This leads to a very uneven
distribution, especially with RAID1 or RAID10 and an uneven
