On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:02:44PM +0900, Tsutomu Itoh wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On 2017/09/12 1:58, David Sterba wrote:
> > There are two types for "not supported", but the correct one is
> > EOPNOTSUPP, let's use that one. The error message in the error case is
> > not very helpful, enhance it at
Hi David,
On 2017/09/12 1:58, David Sterba wrote:
> There are two types for "not supported", but the correct one is
> EOPNOTSUPP, let's use that one. The error message in the error case is
> not very helpful, enhance it at least with the inode number.
When I first posted a similar patch, you
There are two types for "not supported", but the correct one is
EOPNOTSUPP, let's use that one. The error message in the error case is
not very helpful, enhance it at least with the inode number.
The unknown type seems to be the block device (S_IFBLK)(as it's the only
unhandled case. Adding this
