Re: [PATCH] btrfs: set include path relatively

2017-10-14 Thread David Sterba
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 04:01:31PM +0900, Naohiro Aota wrote: > 2017-10-12 21:38 GMT+09:00 David Sterba : > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:22:24AM +0900, Naohiro Aota wrote: > >> Currently, gcc is passed the include directory with full path. As a result, > >> dependency files

Re: [PATCH] btrfs: set include path relatively

2017-10-13 Thread Naohiro Aota
2017-10-12 21:38 GMT+09:00 David Sterba : > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:22:24AM +0900, Naohiro Aota wrote: >> Currently, gcc is passed the include directory with full path. As a result, >> dependency files (*.o.d) also record the full path at the build time. Such >> full path

Re: [PATCH] btrfs: set include path relatively

2017-10-12 Thread David Sterba
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:22:24AM +0900, Naohiro Aota wrote: > Currently, gcc is passed the include directory with full path. As a result, > dependency files (*.o.d) also record the full path at the build time. Such > full path dependency is annoying for sharing the source between multiple >

[PATCH] btrfs: set include path relatively

2017-10-11 Thread Naohiro Aota
Currently, gcc is passed the include directory with full path. As a result, dependency files (*.o.d) also record the full path at the build time. Such full path dependency is annoying for sharing the source between multiple machines, containers, or anything the path differ. And this is the same