On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 05:39:24PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04 2016, NeilBrown wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > When nfsd calls fh_to_dentry, it expect ESTALE or ENOMEM as errors.
> > In particular it can be tempting to return ENOENT, but this is not
> > handled well by nfsd.
> >
> > Rather than
On Thu, Aug 04 2016, NeilBrown wrote:
>
>
> When nfsd calls fh_to_dentry, it expect ESTALE or ENOMEM as errors.
> In particular it can be tempting to return ENOENT, but this is not
> handled well by nfsd.
>
> Rather than requiring strict adherence to error code code filesystems,
> treat all unexpe
On Thu, Aug 04 2016, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 10:19:06AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
>>
>>
>> When nfsd calls fh_to_dentry, it expect ESTALE or ENOMEM as errors.
>> In particular it can be tempting to return ENOENT, but this is not
>> handled well by nfsd.
>>
>> Rather tha
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 05:47:19AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 10:19:06AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> >
> >
> > When nfsd calls fh_to_dentry, it expect ESTALE or ENOMEM as errors.
> > In particular it can be tempting to return ENOENT, but this is not
> > handled well b
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 10:19:06AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
>
>
> When nfsd calls fh_to_dentry, it expect ESTALE or ENOMEM as errors.
> In particular it can be tempting to return ENOENT, but this is not
> handled well by nfsd.
>
> Rather than requiring strict adherence to error code code filesyst
When nfsd calls fh_to_dentry, it expect ESTALE or ENOMEM as errors.
In particular it can be tempting to return ENOENT, but this is not
handled well by nfsd.
Rather than requiring strict adherence to error code code filesystems,
treat all unexpected error codes the same as ESTALE. This is safest
