On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 10:43:30AM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> This test has been failing for btrfs for quite some time,
> at least since 4.7. There are 2 implementation details of btrfs that
> it exposes:
>
> 1. Currently btrfs filesystem under 100mb are created in Mixed block
> group mode.
On 8.01.2018 10:43, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> This test has been failing for btrfs for quite some time,
> at least since 4.7. There are 2 implementation details of btrfs that
> it exposes:
>
> 1. Currently btrfs filesystem under 100mb are created in Mixed block
> group mode. Freespace
On 2018年01月08日 21:55, Timofey Titovets wrote:
> 2018-01-08 15:54 GMT+03:00 Qu Wenruo :
>>
>>
>> On 2018年01月08日 16:43, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>>> This test has been failing for btrfs for quite some time,
>>> at least since 4.7. There are 2 implementation details of btrfs
On 8.01.2018 14:54, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> On 2018年01月08日 16:43, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>> This test has been failing for btrfs for quite some time,
>> at least since 4.7. There are 2 implementation details of btrfs that
>> it exposes:
>>
>> 1. Currently btrfs filesystem under 100mb are
2018-01-08 15:54 GMT+03:00 Qu Wenruo :
>
>
> On 2018年01月08日 16:43, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>> This test has been failing for btrfs for quite some time,
>> at least since 4.7. There are 2 implementation details of btrfs that
>> it exposes:
>>
>> 1. Currently btrfs filesystem
On 2018年01月08日 16:43, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> This test has been failing for btrfs for quite some time,
> at least since 4.7. There are 2 implementation details of btrfs that
> it exposes:
>
> 1. Currently btrfs filesystem under 100mb are created in Mixed block
> group mode. Freespace
This test has been failing for btrfs for quite some time,
at least since 4.7. There are 2 implementation details of btrfs that
it exposes:
1. Currently btrfs filesystem under 100mb are created in Mixed block
group mode. Freespace accounting for it is not 100% accurate - I've
observed around