Re: [PATCH] xfstests: add background noise to test 276 (btrfs backref resolving)

2013-03-20 Thread Rich Johnston
Thanks for submitting this patch Jan, this patch has been committed. Thanks --Rich commit cfe73f711eff55c374d9c0db8921089ec4ad8607 Author: Jan Schmidt list.bt...@jan-o-sch.net Date: Tue Mar 19 16:24:20 2013 + xfstests: add background noise to test 276 (btrfs backref resolving) -- To

[PATCH] xfstests: add background noise to test 276 (btrfs backref resolving)

2013-03-19 Thread Jan Schmidt
The backref resolver test for btrfs was run on a static file system so far. Resolving backrefs on a busy file system is what happens in reality and that is what should be checked by this test. I added a parameter such that the script can easily be changed to the former behavior for development

Re: [PATCH] xfstests: add background noise to test 276 (btrfs backref resolving)

2013-03-19 Thread Eric Sandeen
On 3/19/13 11:24 AM, Jan Schmidt wrote: The backref resolver test for btrfs was run on a static file system so far. Resolving backrefs on a busy file system is what happens in reality and that is what should be checked by this test. I added a parameter such that the script can easily be

Re: [PATCH] xfstests: add background noise to test 276 (btrfs backref resolving)

2013-03-19 Thread Jan Schmidt
On 19.03.2013 18:09, Eric Sandeen wrote: Furthermore, this increases two constants which make the test simply cycle a few seconds longer, increasing the chance to hit on something suspicious in case we broke something. Normally we don't change existing tests lest new failures look like

Re: [PATCH] xfstests: add background noise to test 276 (btrfs backref resolving)

2013-03-19 Thread Dave Chinner
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 08:17:57PM +0100, Jan Schmidt wrote: On 19.03.2013 18:09, Eric Sandeen wrote: Furthermore, this increases two constants which make the test simply cycle a few seconds longer, increasing the chance to hit on something suspicious in case we broke something.