On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 09:32:19AM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> The warning is aimed to check whether this ref_cow root is in this
> transaction, so we can change it
> to WARN_ON(root->ref_cows && trans->transaction->transid > root->last_trans);
Ok, I'll add this change to next testing round.
> BTW, d
On 11/30/2011 12:17 AM, David Sterba wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 09:18:35AM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
>> a) For the first one (last_snapshot bug),
>>
>> The test involves three processes (derived from Chris):
>>
>> mkfs.btrfs /dev/xxx
>> mount /dev/xxx /mnt
>>
>> 1) run compilebench -i 30 --makej -
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 09:18:35AM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> a) For the first one (last_snapshot bug),
>
> The test involves three processes (derived from Chris):
>
> mkfs.btrfs /dev/xxx
> mount /dev/xxx /mnt
>
> 1) run compilebench -i 30 --makej -D /mnt
>
> Let compilebench run until it starts th
On 11/28/2011 11:10 PM, David Sterba wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 06:10:19PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
>> We've been sufferring two big bugs with sub transid:
>> one is a bug related to root's last_snapshot, the other is a bug related to
>> disk extent refs' generation.
>
> Do you have a testcase t
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 06:10:19PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> We've been sufferring two big bugs with sub transid:
> one is a bug related to root's last_snapshot, the other is a bug related to
> disk extent refs' generation.
Do you have a testcase to trigger and check these bugs?
> 1) The first patch
NOTE:
This patchset is based on "danger" branch.
We've been sufferring two big bugs with sub transid:
one is a bug related to root's last_snapshot, the other is a bug related to
disk extent refs' generation.
1) The first patch fixes a warning,
2) the second one fixes the last_snapshot bug,
3) the
