On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 02:35:59PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 01:45:06PM -0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> > Dax on btrfs is not ready for multiple device.
>
> How about DUP? Technically it's not multi-device but still stores
> multiple copies, so I don't know if the implementation
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 01:45:06PM -0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> Dax on btrfs is not ready for multiple device.
How about DUP? Technically it's not multi-device but still stores
multiple copies, so I don't know if the implementation is ok with that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Dax on btrfs is not ready for multiple device.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo
---
fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 6 ++
fs/btrfs/super.c | 7 +++
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
index 7acbd2c..ab30d88 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
+++