bytenr in btrfs_sector_sum is unnecessary, because the extents that
btrfs_sector_sum points to are continuous，we can find out the expected
checksums by btrfs_ordered_sum's bytenr and the offset, so we can
remove btrfs_sector_sum's bytenr.
After removing bytenr, we don't use the while loop to get
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 04:11:38PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
bytenr in btrfs_sector_sum is unnecessary, because the extents that
btrfs_sector_sum points to are continuous，we can find out the expected
checksums by btrfs_ordered_sum's bytenr and the offset, so we can
remove btrfs_sector_sum's
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:38:34PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 04:11:38PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
bytenr in btrfs_sector_sum is unnecessary, because the extents that
btrfs_sector_sum points to are continuous，we can find out the expected
checksums by btrfs_ordered_sum's
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 22:41:50 +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:38:34PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 04:11:38PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
bytenr in btrfs_sector_sum is unnecessary, because the extents that
btrfs_sector_sum points to are continuous，we can find out the
