On 14/11/2018 22:04, David Sterba wrote:
> The fix has been folded to the original patch already, same the other
> one removing 'tree'. If you used linux-next to run the build, then it's
> probably lagging behind the development branches that are synced to
> kernel.org after some testing. The devel
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 02:35:19PM +0100, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> Commit 2922040236f9 (btrfs: Remove extent_io_ops::writepage_end_io_hook)
> removed the indirection to extent_io_ops::writepage_end_io_hook but didn't
> remove the tree variable which then became unused.
>
> Remove 'tree' as well
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 02:35:19PM +0100, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> Commit 2922040236f9 (btrfs: Remove extent_io_ops::writepage_end_io_hook)
> removed the indirection to extent_io_ops::writepage_end_io_hook but didn't
> remove the tree variable which then became unused.
>
> Remove 'tree' as well
Commit 2922040236f9 (btrfs: Remove extent_io_ops::writepage_end_io_hook)
removed the indirection to extent_io_ops::writepage_end_io_hook but didn't
remove the tree variable which then became unused.
Remove 'tree' as well to silence the warning when -Wunused-but-set-variable
is used to compile btrf
