Suppose you have 3
devices in a raid1 and one goes missing. The user can now, in trying to
fix this, mount each of the two remaining devices separately (by
accident of course), in which case you can still have a split brain
situation.
Austin, that's not possible a N disk raid1 can still
On 2017-12-18 09:39, Anand Jain wrote:
Now the procedure to assemble the disks would be to continue to mount
the good set first without the device set on which new data can be
ignored, and later run btrfs device scan to bring in the missing device
and complete the RAID group which then shall
On 12/18/2017 08:52 PM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
On 17.12.2017 15:52, Anand Jain wrote:
In two device configs of RAID1/RAID5 where one device can be missing
in the degraded mount, or in the configs such as four devices RAID6
where two devices can be missing, in these type of configs it can
Now the procedure to assemble the disks would be to continue to mount
the good set first without the device set on which new data can be
ignored, and later run btrfs device scan to bring in the missing device
and complete the RAID group which then shall reset the flag
On 17.12.2017 15:52, Anand Jain wrote:
> In two device configs of RAID1/RAID5 where one device can be missing
> in the degraded mount, or in the configs such as four devices RAID6
> where two devices can be missing, in these type of configs it can form
> two separate set of devices where each of
On 2017-12-17 08:52, Anand Jain wrote:
In two device configs of RAID1/RAID5 where one device can be missing
in the degraded mount, or in the configs such as four devices RAID6
where two devices can be missing, in these type of configs it can form
two separate set of devices where each of the set
In two device configs of RAID1/RAID5 where one device can be missing
in the degraded mount, or in the configs such as four devices RAID6
where two devices can be missing, in these type of configs it can form
two separate set of devices where each of the set can be mounted without
the other set.
