On Tuesday, 02 November, 2010, you (Sage Weil) wrote:
On Tue, 2 Nov 2010, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
Like the command btrfs subvol snapshot, I think that it is better to add
a
modifier instead of a new command.
btrfs filesystem sync [--async]
Sorry if I noticed this too late. But
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 07:58:27PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
On Monday, 01 November, 2010, Sage Weil wrote:
The 'start-sync' command initiates a sync, but does not wait for it to
complete. A transaction is printed that can be fed to 'wait-sync', which
will wait for it to commit.
On Monday, 01 November, 2010, Sage Weil wrote:
The 'start-sync' command initiates a sync, but does not wait for it to
complete. A transaction is printed that can be fed to 'wait-sync', which
will wait for it to commit.
'wait-sync' can also be used in combination with 'async-snapshot' to
On Tue, 2 Nov 2010, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
Like the command btrfs subvol snapshot, I think that it is better to add a
modifier instead of a new command.
btrfs filesystem sync [--async]
Sorry if I noticed this too late. But I don't see a valid reason to add
another command. From a
The 'start-sync' command initiates a sync, but does not wait for it to
complete. A transaction is printed that can be fed to 'wait-sync', which
will wait for it to commit.
'wait-sync' can also be used in combination with 'async-snapshot' to wait
for an async snapshot creation to commit.
Updates
