On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 3:10 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> From: Jeff Layton
>
> Since i_version is mostly treated as an opaque value, we can exploit that
> fact to avoid incrementing it when no one is watching. With that change,
> we can avoid incrementing the
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 09:10:59AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> From: Jeff Layton
>
> Since i_version is mostly treated as an opaque value, we can exploit that
> fact to avoid incrementing it when no one is watching. With that change,
> we can avoid incrementing the counter on
From: Jeff Layton
Since i_version is mostly treated as an opaque value, we can exploit that
fact to avoid incrementing it when no one is watching. With that change,
we can avoid incrementing the counter on writes, unless someone has
queried for it since it was last