On 11/30/2010 10:30 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:03:58AM +0800, liubo wrote:
>> On 11/30/2010 04:10 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 05:52:47PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
Btrfs has a number of BUG_ON()s, which may lead btrfs to unpleasant panic.
Meanwh
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 10:03:58AM +0800, liubo wrote:
> On 11/30/2010 04:10 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 05:52:47PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
> >> Btrfs has a number of BUG_ON()s, which may lead btrfs to unpleasant panic.
> >> Meanwhile, they are very ugly and should be handled
On 11/30/2010 04:10 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 05:52:47PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
>> Btrfs has a number of BUG_ON()s, which may lead btrfs to unpleasant panic.
>> Meanwhile, they are very ugly and should be handled more propriately.
>>
>> There are mainly two ways to deal with
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 01:12:17PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 05:52:47PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
> >> Btrfs has a number of BUG_ON()s, which may lead btrfs to unpleasant panic.
> >> Meanwhile, they are very ugly and sh
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 05:52:47PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
>> Btrfs has a number of BUG_ON()s, which may lead btrfs to unpleasant panic.
>> Meanwhile, they are very ugly and should be handled more propriately.
>>
>> There are mainly two ways to
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 05:52:47PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
> Btrfs has a number of BUG_ON()s, which may lead btrfs to unpleasant panic.
> Meanwhile, they are very ugly and should be handled more propriately.
>
> There are mainly two ways to deal with these BUG_ON()s.
>
> 1. For those errors which
2010/11/25, Miao Xie :
> Btrfs has a number of BUG_ON()s, which may lead btrfs to unpleasant panic.
> Meanwhile, they are very ugly and should be handled more propriately.
>
> There are mainly two ways to deal with these BUG_ON()s.
Yes, I agree.
>
> 1. For those errors which can be handled well by
Btrfs has a number of BUG_ON()s, which may lead btrfs to unpleasant panic.
Meanwhile, they are very ugly and should be handled more propriately.
There are mainly two ways to deal with these BUG_ON()s.
1. For those errors which can be handled well by callers, we just return their
error number to c
