On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 22:38:32 +
Hugo Mills wrote:
> > Btrfs quotas just don't work well at this point, being both not
> > always reliable, and dramatically increasing the scaling issues.
>
> Even after the recent rewrite? I'd expect that to drop back to
> "unproven".
There was a regression
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:29:15PM +, Duncan wrote:
> Swâmi Petaramesh posted on Tue, 25 Aug 2015 16:03:55 +0200 as excerpted:
>
> > Le mardi 25 août 2015 15:25:12 Swâmi Petaramesh a écrit :
> >> Uh, I've started [btrfs check --repair] hours ago, and it has been
> >> eating 100% CPU on one of
Swâmi Petaramesh posted on Tue, 25 Aug 2015 16:03:55 +0200 as excerpted:
> Le mardi 25 août 2015 15:25:12 Swâmi Petaramesh a écrit :
>> Uh, I've started [btrfs check --repair] hours ago, and it has been
>> eating 100% CPU on one of my cores since, without apparently yet
>> finding a single error.
Le mardi 25 août 2015 15:25:12 Swâmi Petaramesh a écrit :
> Uh, I've started it hours ago, and it has been eating 100% CPU on one of my
> cores since, without apparently yet finding a single error.
btrfs check finally came to an end, and fixed dirs iszes.
The 1st good news is that my FS didn't d
Le mardi 25 août 2015 08:37:46 vous avez écrit :
> The errors 200 flags are reasonably common, and I believe
> btrfs check --repair handles them well.
Uh, I've started it hours ago, and it has been eating 100% CPU on one of my
cores since, without apparently yet finding a single error. It seems t
Swâmi Petaramesh posted on Tue, 25 Aug 2015 10:18:26 +0200 as excerpted:
> Le vendredi 21 août 2015 11:23:19 Duncan a écrit :
>> So I'd suggest running btrfs check, without --repair, first, and see
>> what it says. If the only reported problems have to do with inode
>> refcounts, then (assuming y
Le vendredi 21 août 2015 11:23:19 Duncan a écrit :
> So I'd suggest running btrfs check, without --repair, first, and see what
> it says. If the only reported problems have to do with inode refcounts,
> then (assuming your backups are current, just in case, admin's rule of
> backups, if you don