Robert White rwh...@pobox.com writes:
You need to buy better disks. 8-)
Where can one buy these better disks with reasonable prices?-) Disks are
best thought of as consumables.
I use SMART (smartmontools etc) and its tests to keep track of and
warn me of such issues. It's way more likely to
I use SMART (smartmontools etc) and its tests to keep track of and warn
me of such issues. It's way more likely to catch incipient media
failures long before scrub would. It's also more likely to correct
situations before they become visible to userspace. Its also a way
better full-platter scan
On 12/12/2014 01:17 AM, Erkki Seppala wrote:
Robert White rwh...@pobox.com writes:
You need to buy better disks. 8-)
Where can one buy these better disks with reasonable prices?-) Disks are
best thought of as consumables.
A good disk is only about 9% more expensive. So like the WD green
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 11:17:58AM +0200, Erkki Seppala wrote:
That may be sort of true, but I think even SMART is helped by the fact
that the media is read through from the beginning to the end*, so it can
detect even the errors that don't bubble through the IO layer. And BTRFS
can indeed
sys.syphus posted on Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:15:17 -0600 as excerpted:
I am working on a script that i can run daily that will do maintenance
on my btrfs mountpoints. is there any reason not to concurrently do all
of the above? possibly including discards as well.
also, is there anything
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:17:28 Robert White wrote:
A _monthly_ scrub is maybe worth scheduling if you have a lot of churn
in your disk contents.
I do weekly scrubs. I recently had 2 disks in a RAID-1 array develop read
errors within a month of each other. The first scrub after replacing sdb
On 12/11/2014 05:00 PM, Russell Coker wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 17:17:28 Robert White wrote:
A _monthly_ scrub is maybe worth scheduling if you have a lot of churn
in your disk contents.
I do weekly scrubs. I recently had 2 disks in a RAID-1 array develop read
errors within a month of each
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 04:15:17PM -0600, sys.syphus wrote:
I am working on a script that i can run daily that will do maintenance
on my btrfs mountpoints. is there any reason not to concurrently do
all of the above? possibly including discards as well.
also, is there anything existing
I am working on a script that i can run daily that will do maintenance
on my btrfs mountpoints. is there any reason not to concurrently do
all of the above? possibly including discards as well.
also, is there anything existing currently that will do maintenance on
btrfs so i don't have to
On 12/10/2014 02:15 PM, sys.syphus wrote:
I am working on a script that i can run daily that will do maintenance
on my btrfs mountpoints. is there any reason not to concurrently do
all of the above? possibly including discards as well.
also, is there anything existing currently that will do
10 matches
Mail list logo