I think you are correct. it has an odd number of members and its
raid1. the most recent addition only has half the capacity of the
others. that would appear to be by design.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Calvin Walton calvin.wal...@kepstin.ca wrote:
On Mon, 2015-01-05 at 13:18 -0600,
I start it. I check it and its like 2% done
Several hours its stopped and the re-balance clearly didn't finish
because I can see one member of the array has a fraction of the usage
of the others. Dmesg shows no errors.
Thoughts? should start it again in the foreground with verbosity or
something?
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 01:18:20PM -0600, sys.syphus wrote:
I start it. I check it and its like 2% done
Several hours its stopped and the re-balance clearly didn't finish
because I can see one member of the array has a fraction of the usage
of the others. Dmesg shows no errors.
How large
On Mon, 2015-01-05 at 13:18 -0600, sys.syphus wrote:
I start it. I check it and its like 2% done
Several hours its stopped and the re-balance clearly didn't finish
because I can see one member of the array has a fraction of the usage
of the others. Dmesg shows no errors.
Thoughts? should
