On 10/27/2011 11:27 AM, Chris Mason wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've pulled in Hugo's integration tree, minus the features that were not
yet in the kernel. This also has a few small commits that I had queued
up outside of the fsck work.
Hugo, many thanks for keeping up the integration tree! Taking
Hi everyone,
I've pulled in Hugo's integration tree, minus the features that were not
yet in the kernel. This also has a few small commits that I had queued
up outside of the fsck work.
Hugo, many thanks for keeping up the integration tree! Taking out the
features not in the kernel
Hi everyone,
I've pulled in Hugo's integration tree, minus the features that were not
yet in the kernel. This also has a few small commits that I had queued
up outside of the fsck work.
Hugo, many thanks for keeping up the integration tree! Taking out the
features not in the kernel meant I had
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 11:27:07AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
I've pulled in Hugo's integration tree, minus the features that were not
yet in the kernel. This also has a few small commits that I had queued
up outside of the fsck work.
Hugo, many thanks for keeping up the integration tree!
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 04:58:54PM +0100, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 11:27:07AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
I've pulled in Hugo's integration tree, minus the features that were not
yet in the kernel. This also has a few small commits that I had queued
up outside of the fsck
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 05:32:58PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 04:58:54PM +0100, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 11:27:07AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
I've pulled in Hugo's integration tree, minus the features that were not
yet in the kernel. This also has
I've also got the basis of a set of regression tests for -progs,
which I'll send out patches for in the next couple of days. At the
moment, it only tests building and snapshots, but should be relatively
easily extensible to the other bits of ./btrfs (although I'm not sure
how we can easily
