Original Message
Subject: Re: Can't mount subvolume with ro option
From: Sébastien ROHAUT sebastien.roh...@free.fr
To: Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com
Date: 2014年06月28日 19:02
Le 28/06/2014 00:12, Chris Murphy a écrit :
On Jun 27, 2014, at 4:08 PM, Chris Murphy li
Original Message
Subject: Re: Can't mount subvolume with ro option
From: Qu Wenruo quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com
To: Sébastien ROHAUT sebastien.roh...@free.fr, Chris Murphy
li...@colorremedies.com
Date: 2014年06月30日 10:19
Original Message
Subject: Re: Can't mount
On Jun 29, 2014, at 8:57 PM, Qu Wenruo quwen...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
Finally find the stable method to reproduce the problem on 3.16-rc2,
the point is if we mount subvol,ro first, then you can't mount the hole
device:
# mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sda6
# mount /dev/sda6 /mnt/btrfs/
# btrfs
Le 28/06/2014 00:12, Chris Murphy a écrit :
On Jun 27, 2014, at 4:08 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
On Jun 27, 2014, at 2:07 PM, Sébastien ROHAUT sebastien.roh...@free.fr wrote:
Hi,
In the wiki, it's said we can mount subvolumes with different mount options.
nosuid, nodev,
On Jun 27, 2014, at 2:07 PM, Sébastien ROHAUT sebastien.roh...@free.fr wrote:
Hi,
In the wiki, it's said we can mount subvolumes with different mount options.
nosuid, nodev, rw and ro are listed, as valid generic mount options.
This might require 3.15. I don't recall it working with early
On Jun 27, 2014, at 4:08 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
On Jun 27, 2014, at 2:07 PM, Sébastien ROHAUT sebastien.roh...@free.fr
wrote:
Hi,
In the wiki, it's said we can mount subvolumes with different mount options.
nosuid, nodev, rw and ro are listed, as valid
