In my opinion, the point is not the default snapshot creation mode but
rather default usage, equals user's expectation.
On 11/30/10, Li Zefan wrote:
> C Anthony Risinger wrote:
>> On Nov 29, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Andrey Kuzmin
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm not sure why zfs came up, they don't own the term :)
C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Andrey Kuzmin
> wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure why zfs came up, they don't own the term :). As to
>> zfs/overhead topic, I doubt there's any difference between clone and
>> writable shapshot (there should be none, of course, it's just two
>> diff
On Nov 29, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Andrey Kuzmin
wrote:
> I'm not sure why zfs came up, they don't own the term :). As to
> zfs/overhead topic, I doubt there's any difference between clone and
> writable shapshot (there should be none, of course, it's just two
> different names for the same concept).
>
I'm not sure why zfs came up, they don't own the term :). As to
zfs/overhead topic, I doubt there's any difference between clone and
writable shapshot (there should be none, of course, it's just two
different names for the same concept).
Regards,
Andrey
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Mike F
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Andrey Kuzmin
wrote:
> This may sound excessive as any new concept introduction that late in
> development, but readonly/writable snapshots could be further
> differentiated by naming the latter clones. This way end-user would
> naturally perceive snapsot as read-o
This may sound excessive as any new concept introduction that late in
development, but readonly/writable snapshots could be further
differentiated by naming the latter clones. This way end-user would
naturally perceive snapsot as read-only PIT fs image, while clone
would naturally refer to (writabl
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:41 PM, David Arendt wrote:
> On 11/29/10 21:02, Mike Fedyk wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Li Zefan wrote:
>>>
>>> (Cc: Sage Weil for changes in async snapshots)
>>>
>>> This patchset adds readonly-snapshots support. You can create a
>>> readonly snapsho
On 11/29/10 21:02, Mike Fedyk wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Li Zefan wrote:
(Cc: Sage Weil for changes in async snapshots)
This patchset adds readonly-snapshots support. You can create a
readonly snapshot, and you can also set a snapshot readonly/writable
on the fly.
A few readonl
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Li Zefan wrote:
> (Cc: Sage Weil for changes in async snapshots)
>
> This patchset adds readonly-snapshots support. You can create a
> readonly snapshot, and you can also set a snapshot readonly/writable
> on the fly.
>
> A few readonly checks are added in setatt
