14.08.2016 19:20, Chris Murphy пишет:
>
> As an aside, I'm finding the size information for the data chunk in
> 'fi us' confusing...
>
> The sample file system contains one file:
> [root@f24s ~]# ls -lh /mnt/0
> total 1.4G
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 1.4G Aug 13 19:24
>
On Sunday, August 14, 2016 8:04:14 PM CEST you wrote:
> On Sunday, August 14, 2016 10:20:39 AM CEST you wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Wolfgang Mader
> >
> > wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have two questions
> > >
> > > 1) Layout of raid10 in btrfs
>
14.08.2016 19:20, Chris Murphy пишет:
...
>
> This volume now has about a dozen chunks created by kernel code, and
> the stripe X to devid Y mapping is identical. Using dd and hexdump,
> I'm finding that stripe 0 and 1 are mirrored pairs, they contain
> identical information. And stripe 2 and 3
On Sunday, August 14, 2016 10:20:39 AM CEST you wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Wolfgang Mader
>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have two questions
> >
> > 1) Layout of raid10 in btrfs
> > btrfs pools all devices and than stripes and mirrors across this pool.
On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Wolfgang Mader
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have two questions
>
> 1) Layout of raid10 in btrfs
> btrfs pools all devices and than stripes and mirrors across this pool. Is it
> therefore correct, that a raid10 layout consisting of 4 devices
On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 05:39:18PM +0200, Wolfgang Mader wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have two questions
>
> 1) Layout of raid10 in btrfs
> btrfs pools all devices and than stripes and mirrors across this pool. Is it
> therefore correct, that a raid10 layout consisting of 4 devices a,b,c,d is
> _not_
>
Wolfgang Mader posted on Sat, 13 Aug 2016 17:39:18 +0200 as excerpted:
> Hi,
>
> I have two questions
>
> 1) Layout of raid10 in btrfs btrfs pools all devices and than stripes
> and mirrors across this pool. Is it therefore correct, that a raid10
> layout consisting of 4 devices a,b,c,d is
Hi,
I have two questions
1) Layout of raid10 in btrfs
btrfs pools all devices and than stripes and mirrors across this pool. Is it
therefore correct, that a raid10 layout consisting of 4 devices a,b,c,d is
_not_
raid0
|---|
-
|a|