On 11/14/2018 03:24 PM, Lu Fengqi wrote:
=
WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
4.20.0-rc2+ #23 Tainted: G O
-
fs/btrfs/volumes.c:886 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
Use btrfs_info_in_rcu instead of pr_info for the required
On 05/31/2018 05:47 PM, David Sterba wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 11:05:47AM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
Balance arg info is an important information to be reviewed for the
system audit. So this patch adds them to the kernel log.
Example:
->btrfs bal start -f
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 11:15 AM Filipe Manana wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 9:14 AM Anand Jain wrote:
> >
> > Support for a new command 'btrfs dev forget [dev]' is proposed here
> > to undo the effects of 'btrfs dev scan [dev]'. For this purpose
> > this patch proposes to use ioctl #5 as
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 9:14 AM Anand Jain wrote:
>
> Support for a new command 'btrfs dev forget [dev]' is proposed here
> to undo the effects of 'btrfs dev scan [dev]'. For this purpose
> this patch proposes to use ioctl #5 as it was empty.
> IOW(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 5, ..)
> This patch
On 14.11.18 г. 9:24 ч., Lu Fengqi wrote:
> =
> WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
> 4.20.0-rc2+ #23 Tainted: G O
> -
> fs/btrfs/volumes.c:886 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
>
> Use btrfs_info_in_rcu instead of pr_info for
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 02:45:45PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
>On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 02:41:09PM +0800, Lu Fengqi wrote:
>> This patchset can be fetched from github:
>> https://github.com/littleroad/linux.git dedupe_latest
>>
>> Now the new base is v4.20-rc1.
>
>Before anybody spends more time
On 11/14/2018 01:24 AM, David Sterba wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 10:22:19PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
replace cancel thread can race with the replace start thread and if
fs_info::scrubs_running is not yet set the btrfs_scrub_cancel() will fail
to stop the scrub thread, so the scrub thread
I am ok with the least used path approach here for the IO routing
that's probably most reasonable in generic configurations. It can
be default read mirror policy as well.
But as I mentioned. Not all configurations would agree to the heuristic
approach here. For example: To make use of the SAN
On 2018/11/14 上午1:58, Filipe Manana wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 5:08 PM David Sterba wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 10:33:33PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 01:49:12PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
This patchset can be fetched from github:
On 12/11/2018 12.58, Timofey Titovets wrote:
> From: Timofey Titovets
>
> Currently btrfs raid1/10 balancer bаlance requests to mirrors,
> based on pid % num of mirrors.
[...]
> v6 -> v7:
> - Fixes based on Nikolay Borisov review:
> * Assume num == 2
> * Remove "for" loop based
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 5:08 PM David Sterba wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 10:33:33PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 01:49:12PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> > > This patchset can be fetched from github:
> > >
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 10:22:15PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> v1->v2:
> 2/9: Drop writeback required
> 3/9: Drop writeback required
> 7/9: Use the condition within the WARN_ON()
> 6/9: Use the condition within the ASSERT()
>
> Replace-start and replace-cancel threads can race to create a
On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 10:22:19PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> replace cancel thread can race with the replace start thread and if
> fs_info::scrubs_running is not yet set the btrfs_scrub_cancel() will fail
> to stop the scrub thread, so the scrub thread continue with the scrub for
> replace which
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 10:33:33PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 01:49:12PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> > This patchset can be fetched from github:
> > https://github.com/adam900710/linux/tree/qgroup_delayed_subtree_rebased
> >
> > Which is based on v4.20-rc1.
>
> Thanks,
On 11/13/18 4:03 PM, David Sterba wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 07:40:22PM +, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
>> On 10/11/2018 05:13 PM, David Sterba wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 11:24:37PM +0200, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
This patch set contains an additional fix for a newly exposed
On 11/13/2018 11:31 PM, David Sterba wrote:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 09:31:04PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
+ /*
+ * we are going to replace the device path, make sure its the
+ * same device if the device mounted
+ */
+ if (device->bdev) {
+
On 11/13/2018 11:21 PM, David Sterba wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 10:45:17AM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
(Thanks for the comments on requiring to warn_on if we fail the device change.)
(This fixes an ugly bug, I appreciate if you have any further comments).
Its not that impossible to imagine
On 11/13/2018 10:31 AM, David Sterba wrote:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 09:31:04PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
+ /*
+ * we are going to replace the device path, make sure its the
+ * same device if the device mounted
+ */
+ if (device->bdev) {
+ struct
On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 09:31:04PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> >> + /*
> >> + * we are going to replace the device path, make sure its the
> >> + * same device if the device mounted
> >> + */
> >> + if (device->bdev) {
> >> + struct block_device
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 10:45:17AM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> (Thanks for the comments on requiring to warn_on if we fail the device
> change.)
> (This fixes an ugly bug, I appreciate if you have any further comments).
>
> Its not that impossible to imagine that a device OR a btrfs image is
>
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 07:40:22PM +, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
> On 10/11/2018 05:13 PM, David Sterba wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 11:24:37PM +0200, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
> >> This patch set contains an additional fix for a newly exposed bug after
> >> the previous attempt to fix
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 2:31 PM David Sterba wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 02:48:29PM +, Filipe Manana wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 2:37 PM Filipe Manana wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 2:35 PM Qu Wenruo wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 2018/11/8 下午9:17,
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 04:36:34PM +, Filipe Manana wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 4:34 PM David Sterba wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 04:30:35PM +, Filipe Manana wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 4:29 PM David Sterba wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 01:48:40PM +0100, Filipe
On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 02:48:29PM +, Filipe Manana wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 2:37 PM Filipe Manana wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 2:35 PM Qu Wenruo wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2018/11/8 下午9:17, fdman...@kernel.org wrote:
> > > > From: Filipe Manana
> > > >
> > > > When
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 02:41:09PM +0800, Lu Fengqi wrote:
> This patchset can be fetched from github:
> https://github.com/littleroad/linux.git dedupe_latest
>
> Now the new base is v4.20-rc1.
Before anybody spends more time with this patchset: this is a big
feature and quite intrusive to
вт, 13 нояб. 2018 г. в 04:52, Nick Terrell :
>
>
>
> > On Nov 12, 2018, at 4:33 PM, David Sterba wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 11:11:08AM -0700, Nick Terrell wrote:
> >> From: Jennifer Liu
> >>
> >> Adds zstd compression level support to btrfs. Zstd requires
> >> different amounts of
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 10:23:58AM +, fdman...@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Filipe Manana
>
> After the simplification of the fast fsync patch done recently by commit
> b5e6c3e170b7 ("btrfs: always wait on ordered extents at fsync time") and
> commit e7175a692765 ("btrfs: remove the wait
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 11:06:41AM -0800, Rosen Penev wrote:
> Replaced bswap with _ variants. While it's a glibc extension, all of the
> popular libc implementations (glibc, uClibc, musl, BIONIC) seem to support
> it.
>
> Added static inline to two functions to match little endian variants. This
David, Gentle ping.
Thanks, Anand
On 11/12/2018 03:50 PM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
On 12.11.18 г. 6:58 ч., Anand Jain wrote:
The dev_replace_state defines are miss matched between the
BTRFS_IOCTL_DEV_REPLACE_STATE_* and BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_ITEM_STATE_* [1].
[1]
-
On 11/06/2018 11:34 PM, fdman...@kernel.org wrote:
From: Filipe Manana
We were sorting numerical values with the 'sort' tool without telling it
that we are sorting numbers, giving us unexpected ordering. So just pass
the '-n' option to the 'sort' tool.
Example:
$ echo -e "11\n9\n20" |
On 2018/11/13 下午5:48, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>
>
> On 13.11.18 г. 8:09 ч., Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> These two flags are only used to set btrfs_qgroup::rsv_rfer/excl number,
>> but then are never used.
>>
>> Nor these flags are really used by btrfs-progs, so it's pretty safe just
>> to deprecate
On 13.11.18 г. 8:09 ч., Qu Wenruo wrote:
> BTRFS_QGROUP_LIMIT_RSV_RFER/EXCL are never used by btrfs-progs.
> And kernel only do the basic assignment but don't really make use of
> them.
>
> So deprecate these two flags in btrfs-progs.
> Also, add some comment for all the used flags.
>
>
On 13.11.18 г. 9:05 ч., Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Inside qgroup_rsv_add/release(), we have trace events
> trace_qgroup_update_reserve() to catch reserved space update.
>
> However we still have two manual trace_qgroup_update_reserve() calls
> just outside these functions.
>
> Remove these duplicated
On 13.11.18 г. 8:09 ч., Qu Wenruo wrote:
> These two flags are only used to set btrfs_qgroup::rsv_rfer/excl number,
> but then are never used.
>
> Nor these flags are really used by btrfs-progs, so it's pretty safe just
> to deprecate them in next kernel release.
>
> This patch will mark
On 2018/11/13 下午2:09, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Just to Make "git status" more clean.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo
Please discard this one patch, as now we don't build .gz man pages anymore.
> ---
> .gitignore | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
>
> On Nov 12, 2018, at 4:33 PM, David Sterba wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 11:11:08AM -0700, Nick Terrell wrote:
>> From: Jennifer Liu
>>
>> Adds zstd compression level support to btrfs. Zstd requires
>> different amounts of memory for each level, so the design had
>> to be modified to
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 11:11:08AM -0700, Nick Terrell wrote:
> From: Jennifer Liu
>
> Adds zstd compression level support to btrfs. Zstd requires
> different amounts of memory for each level, so the design had
> to be modified to allow set_level() to allocate memory. We
> preallocate one
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 11:11:08AM -0700, Nick Terrell wrote:
> From: Jennifer Liu
>
> Adds zstd compression level support to btrfs. Zstd requires
> different amounts of memory for each level, so the design had
> to be modified to allow set_level() to allocate memory. We
> preallocate one
On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 08:12:39PM -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 04:28:10PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 05:07:00PM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7.11.18 г. 16:49 ч., David Sterba wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at
On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 01:49:12PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> This patchset can be fetched from github:
> https://github.com/adam900710/linux/tree/qgroup_delayed_subtree_rebased
>
> Which is based on v4.20-rc1.
Thanks, I'll add it to for-next soon.
24 which would
> spuriously fail its balance operations. The reason was that when balance
> was run following re-introduction of the missing raid1 disk
> __btrfs_map_block would map the read request to stripe 0, which
> corresponded to devid 2 (the disk which is being removed in the test)
On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 05:06:07PM +0800, Ethan Lien wrote:
> Snapshot is expected to be fast. But if there are writers steadily
> create dirty pages in our subvolume, the snapshot may take a very long
> time to complete. To fix the problem, we use tagged writepage for
> snapshot flusher as we do
On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 10:18:08AM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> This parameter was never used, yet was part of the interface of the
> function ever since its introduction as extent_io_ops::writepage_end_io_hook
> in e6dcd2dc9c48 ("Btrfs: New data=ordered implementation"). Now that
> NULL is
On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 10:18:05AM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> Here are 3 minor patches that further clean up writepage_delalloc. The first
> one moves the extent locked check in the caller of writepage_delalloc since
> this seems more natural. This paves the way for the second patch which
On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 04:16:38PM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> Before btrfs_map_bio submits all stripe bio it does a number of checks
> to ensure the device for every stripe is present. However, it doesn't
> do a DEV_STATE_MISSING check, instead this is relegated to the lower
> level
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 01:05:15PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> dev_replace::replace_state has been set to
> BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_ITEM_STATE_NEVER_STARTED (0) in the same function,
> So delete the line which sets replace_state = 0;
>
> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain
Added to misc-next, thanks.
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 10:24:30AM +, fdman...@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Filipe Manana
>
> The io_err field of struct btrfs_log_ctx is no longer used after the
> recent simplification of the fast fsync path, where we now wait for
> ordered extents to complete before logging the inode. We did
On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 10:43:08AM +, fdman...@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Filipe Manana
>
> We currently are in a loop finding each range (corresponding to a btree
> node/leaf) in a log root's extent io tree and then clean it up. This is a
> waste of time since we are traversing the extent io
On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 04:12:20PM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>
>
> On 9.11.18 г. 16:08 ч., Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> > Here is the 2nd revision of the extent_io_ops optinal callbacks removal.
> > What
> > prompted this version was that I identified a flaw in the initial version -
> > while
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 10:24:30AM +, fdman...@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Filipe Manana
>
> The io_err field of struct btrfs_log_ctx is no longer used after the
> recent simplification of the fast fsync path, where we now wait for
> ordered extents to complete before logging the inode. We did
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 10:23:58AM +, fdman...@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Filipe Manana
>
> After the simplification of the fast fsync patch done recently by commit
> b5e6c3e170b7 ("btrfs: always wait on ordered extents at fsync time") and
> commit e7175a692765 ("btrfs: remove the wait
On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 10:56:42PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 09:51:48PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > Unfortunately, as
> > I'm about to travel, I didn't attempt a revert and a test comparing 4.18,
> > 4.19 and 4.20-rc1 is a few hours away so this could potentially be fixed
On 11/12/18 1:50 PM, Remi Gauvin wrote:
> On 2018-11-12 07:26 AM, Marc Pignat wrote:
...
> fuser /mnt/sda3/@/dev/ptmx
Done the mount somewhere else thing, still no user of this file...
>
> Depending on how Ubuntu was installed, you might not have the @
> subvolume. I think then, root is just
пн, 12 нояб. 2018 г. в 10:28, Nikolay Borisov :
>
>
>
> On 25.09.18 г. 21:38 ч., Timofey Titovets wrote:
> > Currently btrfs raid1/10 balancer bаlance requests to mirrors,
> > based on pid % num of mirrors.
> >
> > Make logic understood:
> > - if one of underline devices are non rotational
> > -
On 12.11.18 г. 12:24 ч., fdman...@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Filipe Manana
>
> The io_err field of struct btrfs_log_ctx is no longer used after the
> recent simplification of the fast fsync path, where we now wait for
> ordered extents to complete before logging the inode. We did this in
>
On 12.11.18 г. 6:58 ч., Anand Jain wrote:
>
> The dev_replace_state defines are miss matched between the
> BTRFS_IOCTL_DEV_REPLACE_STATE_* and BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_ITEM_STATE_* [1].
>
> [1]
> -
> btrfs.h:#define BTRFS_IOCTL_DEV_REPLACE_STATE_FINISHED 2
>
On 12.11.18 г. 7:05 ч., Anand Jain wrote:
> dev_replace::replace_state has been set to
> BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_ITEM_STATE_NEVER_STARTED (0) in the same function,
> So delete the line which sets replace_state = 0;
>
> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov
> ---
>
On 25.09.18 г. 21:38 ч., Timofey Titovets wrote:
> Currently btrfs raid1/10 balancer bаlance requests to mirrors,
> based on pid % num of mirrors.
>
> Make logic understood:
> - if one of underline devices are non rotational
> - Queue length to underline devices
>
> By default try use pid %
On 2018/11/12 下午1:30, Anand Jain wrote:
[snip]
Btrfs-progs could do it with some extra dirty work.
(I purposed offline device resize idea, but didn't implement it yet)
You could use this branch:
https://github.com/adam900710/btrfs-progs/tree/dirty_fix
>>>
>>> Qu,
>>>
>>>
On 11/12/2018 10:12 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
On 2018/11/12 上午9:35, Anand Jain wrote:
On 11/09/2018 09:21 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
On 2018/11/9 上午6:40, Pieter Maes wrote:
Hello,
So, I've had the full disk issue, so when I tried re-balancing,
I got a panic, that pushed filesystem read-only
On 2018/11/12 上午9:35, Anand Jain wrote:
>
>
> On 11/09/2018 09:21 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2018/11/9 上午6:40, Pieter Maes wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> So, I've had the full disk issue, so when I tried re-balancing,
>>>
On 11/09/2018 09:21 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
On 2018/11/9 上午6:40, Pieter Maes wrote:
Hello,
So, I've had the full disk issue, so when I tried re-balancing,
I got a panic, that pushed filesystem read-only and I'm unable to
balance or grow the filesystem now.
fs info:
btrfs fi show /
Label
Gentle ping.
вт, 25 сент. 2018 г. в 21:38, Timofey Titovets :
>
> Currently btrfs raid1/10 balancer bаlance requests to mirrors,
> based on pid % num of mirrors.
>
> Make logic understood:
> - if one of underline devices are non rotational
> - Queue length to underline devices
>
> By default try
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 02:06:30PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 12:09:31AM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 02:29:35PM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > > From: Omar Sandoval
> > >
> > > This series fixes a couple of generic swapfile tests and adds some
>
On 11/07/2018 08:35 PM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
On 7.11.18 г. 13:43 ч., Anand Jain wrote:
At the time of forced unmount we place the running replace to
BTRFS_IOCTL_DEV_REPLACE_STATE_SUSPENDED state, so when the system comes
back and suppose the target device is missing, then let the replace
On 11/08/2018 10:16 PM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
Before btrfs_map_bio submits all stripe bio it does a number of checks
to ensure the device for every stripe is present. However, it doesn't
do a DEV_STATE_MISSING check, instead this is relegated to the lower
level btrfs_schedule_bio (in the
De-duplication must also let use cases to enable de-duplication on per
subvolume level, using the subvolume properties. Similar to compression
and future-encryption.
Thanks, Anand
On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 04:28:10PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 05:07:00PM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 7.11.18 г. 16:49 ч., David Sterba wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 10:54:51AM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 11:17:32AM
On Wed, Nov 07, 2018 at 05:01:19PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:06:08AM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > From: Omar Sandoval
> >
> > There's a race between close_ctree() and cleaner_kthread().
> > close_ctree() sets btrfs_fs_closing(), and the cleaner stops when it
> >
On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 09:51:48PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Unfortunately, as
> I'm about to travel, I didn't attempt a revert and a test comparing 4.18,
> 4.19 and 4.20-rc1 is a few hours away so this could potentially be fixed
> already but I didn't spot any obvious Fixes commit.
>
Still
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 02:41:13PM +0800, Lu Fengqi wrote:
> From: Wang Xiaoguang
>
> Introduce static function inmem_del() to remove hash from in-memory
> dedupe tree.
> And implement btrfs_dedupe_del() and btrfs_dedup_disable() interfaces.
>
> Also for btrfs_dedupe_disable(), add new
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 02:41:10PM +0800, Lu Fengqi wrote:
> From: Wang Xiaoguang
>
> Introduce the header for btrfs in-band(write time) de-duplication
> framework and needed header.
>
> The new de-duplication framework is going to support 2 different dedupe
> methods and 1 dedupe hash.
>
>
On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 04:16:38PM +0200, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> Before btrfs_map_bio submits all stripe bio it does a number of checks
> to ensure the device for every stripe is present. However, it doesn't
> do a DEV_STATE_MISSING check, instead this is relegated to the lower
> level
On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 10:43:08AM +, fdman...@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Filipe Manana
>
> We currently are in a loop finding each range (corresponding to a btree
> node/leaf) in a log root's extent io tree and then clean it up. This is a
> waste of time since we are traversing the extent io
On 2018-11-10 04:20, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
On 2018-11-10 04:15, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
On 2018-11-10 03:20, Roman Mamedov wrote:
On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 03:08:01 +0900
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
After upgrading from kernel 4.16.1 to 4.19.1 and a clean restart,
the fs
no longer mounts:
On 2018-11-10 04:15, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
On 2018-11-10 03:20, Roman Mamedov wrote:
On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 03:08:01 +0900
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
After upgrading from kernel 4.16.1 to 4.19.1 and a clean restart, the
fs
no longer mounts:
Did you try rebooting back to 4.16.1 to see if
On 2018-11-10 03:20, Roman Mamedov wrote:
On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 03:08:01 +0900
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
After upgrading from kernel 4.16.1 to 4.19.1 and a clean restart, the
fs
no longer mounts:
Did you try rebooting back to 4.16.1 to see if it still mounts there?
Yes, just did.
On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 03:08:01 +0900
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> After upgrading from kernel 4.16.1 to 4.19.1 and a clean restart, the fs
> no longer mounts:
Did you try rebooting back to 4.16.1 to see if it still mounts there?
--
With respect,
Roman
tps://github.com/adam900710/btrfs-progs/tree/dirty_fix
>
> It's a quick and dirty fix to allow "btrfs-corrupt-block -X " to
> extent device size to max.
>
> Please try above command to see if it solves your problem.
>
> Thanks,
> Qu
>
>
This worked! thank!s :D
On 9.11.18 г. 16:08 ч., Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> Here is the 2nd revision of the extent_io_ops optinal callbacks removal. What
> prompted this version was that I identified a flaw in the initial version -
> while
> it did check for the presence of an inode in extent_io_tree::private_data, i
On 2018/11/9 下午6:21, Filipe Manana wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 12:27 AM Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2018/11/8 下午10:48, Filipe Manana wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 2:37 PM Filipe Manana wrote:
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 2:35 PM Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
>
> On
On 9.11.18 г. 12:43 ч., fdman...@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Filipe Manana
>
> We currently are in a loop finding each range (corresponding to a btree
> node/leaf) in a log root's extent io tree and then clean it up. This is a
> waste of time since we are traversing the extent io tree's rb_tree
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 12:27 AM Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2018/11/8 下午10:48, Filipe Manana wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 2:37 PM Filipe Manana wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 2:35 PM Qu Wenruo wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 2018/11/8 下午9:17, fdman...@kernel.org wrote:
>
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 1:21 AM robbieko wrote:
>
> robbieko 於 2018-11-06 20:23 寫到:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I can reproduce the infinite loop, the following will describe the
> > reason and example.
> >
> > Example:
> > tree --inodes parent/ send/
> > parent/
> > `-- [261] 261
> > `-- [271]
On 2018/11/9 上午6:40, Pieter Maes wrote:
> Hello,
>
> So, I've had the full disk issue, so when I tried re-balancing,
> I got a panic, that pushed filesystem read-only and I'm unable to
> balance or grow the filesystem now.
>
> fs info:
> btrfs fi show /
> Label: non
robbieko 於 2018-11-06 20:23 寫到:
Hi,
I can reproduce the infinite loop, the following will describe the
reason and example.
Example:
tree --inodes parent/ send/
parent/
`-- [261] 261
`-- [271] 271
`-- [266] 266
|-- [259] 259
|-- [260]
On 2018/11/8 下午10:48, Filipe Manana wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 2:37 PM Filipe Manana wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 2:35 PM Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2018/11/8 下午9:17, fdman...@kernel.org wrote:
From: Filipe Manana
When creating a block group we don't need
вт, 6 нояб. 2018 г. в 9:41, Lu Fengqi :
>
> From: Wang Xiaoguang
>
> Introduce static function inmem_add() to add hash into in-memory tree.
> And now we can implement the btrfs_dedupe_add() interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo
> Signed-off-by: Wang Xiaoguang
> Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik
>
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 2:27 AM, Barbet Alain wrote:
> Hi !
> Just to give you end of the story:
> I move my /var/lib/docker to my home (other partition), and my space
> come back ...
I'm not sure why that would matter. Both btrfs du and regular du
showed only ~350M used in /var which is about
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 2:37 PM Filipe Manana wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 2:35 PM Qu Wenruo wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2018/11/8 下午9:17, fdman...@kernel.org wrote:
> > > From: Filipe Manana
> > >
> > > When creating a block group we don't need to set the log for full commit
> > > if the new
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 2:35 PM Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2018/11/8 下午9:17, fdman...@kernel.org wrote:
> > From: Filipe Manana
> >
> > When creating a block group we don't need to set the log for full commit
> > if the new block group is not used for data. Logged items can only point
> > to
On 2018/11/8 下午9:17, fdman...@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Filipe Manana
>
> When creating a block group we don't need to set the log for full commit
> if the new block group is not used for data. Logged items can only point
> to logical addresses of data block groups (through file extent items)
if (!limit_nr)
> + limit_nr = (u64)-1;
> +
> + dargs->limit_nr = min(tmp, limit_nr);
> + }
> + }
> + if (backend == BTRFS_DEDUPE_BACKEND_ONDISK)
> + dargs->limit_nr = 0;
> +
On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 02:14:43AM +, YueHaibing wrote:
> Fixes gcc '-Wunused-but-set-variable' warning:
>
> fs/btrfs/extent_io.c: In function 'end_extent_writepage':
> fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2406:25: warning:
> variable 'tree' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>
> It not used any
вт, 6 нояб. 2018 г. в 9:41, Lu Fengqi :
>
> From: Wang Xiaoguang
>
> Introduce the header for btrfs in-band(write time) de-duplication
> framework and needed header.
>
> The new de-duplication framework is going to support 2 different dedupe
> methods and 1 dedupe hash.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qu
Hi !
Just to give you end of the story:
I move my /var/lib/docker to my home (other partition), and my space
come back ...
I let docker here & don't try to put it again on / to see if problem come back.
Le mer. 31 oct. 2018 à 08:34, Barbet Alain a écrit :
>
> > Also, since you don't have any
On 11/08/2018 04:52 PM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
On 8.11.18 г. 10:33 ч., Anand Jain wrote:
On 11/07/2018 08:19 PM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
On 7.11.18 г. 13:43 ч., Anand Jain wrote:
+ /* scrub for replace must not be running in suspended state */
+ if
On 8.11.18 г. 10:33 ч., Anand Jain wrote:
>
>
> On 11/07/2018 08:19 PM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 7.11.18 г. 13:43 ч., Anand Jain wrote:
>>> + /* scrub for replace must not be running in suspended state */
>>> + if (btrfs_scrub_cancel(fs_info) != -ENOTCONN)
>>> +
On 11/07/2018 08:19 PM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
On 7.11.18 г. 13:43 ч., Anand Jain wrote:
+ /* scrub for replace must not be running in suspended state */
+ if (btrfs_scrub_cancel(fs_info) != -ENOTCONN)
+ ASSERT(0);
On 11/07/2018 08:17 PM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
On 7.11.18 г. 13:43 ч., Anand Jain wrote:
- WARN_ON(ret);
+ if (ret != -ECANCELED)
+ WARN_ON(ret);
WARN_ON(ret && ret != -ECANCELED)
Will fix.
Thanks, Anand
501 - 600 of 49121 matches
Mail list logo
