Hi,
Sorry for the late reply.
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 10:19:16AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 8/13/15 3:47 AM, Liu Bo wrote:
Btrfs has a problem when defraging a file which has a large fragment'ed
range,
it'd leave the tail extent as a seperate extent instead of merging it with
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 10:19:16AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 8/13/15 3:47 AM, Liu Bo wrote:
Btrfs has a problem when defraging a file which has a large fragment'ed
range,
it'd leave the tail extent as a seperate extent instead of merging it with
previous extents.
This makes
On 8/13/15 3:47 AM, Liu Bo wrote:
Btrfs has a problem when defraging a file which has a large fragment'ed range,
it'd leave the tail extent as a seperate extent instead of merging it with
previous extents.
This makes generic/018 recognize the above regression.
Sorry for the late review, but
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Filipe David Manana
fdman...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Liu Bo bo.li@oracle.com wrote:
Btrfs has a problem when defraging a file which has a large fragment'ed
range,
it'd leave the tail extent as a seperate extent instead of merging
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Liu Bo bo.li@oracle.com wrote:
Btrfs has a problem when defraging a file which has a large fragment'ed range,
it'd leave the tail extent as a seperate extent instead of merging it with
previous extents.
This makes generic/018 recognize the above
