Not what I've been seeing at all, but we've been working a lot in this area
recently. Please retest with btrfs-next. Thanks,
Hi,
I tested again with kernel 3.3.4 ; I wondered if latest btrfs code is
present in this release or not.
Results are very similar with 3.3.4 compared to 3.3.0
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 08:42:45PM +0200, Olivier Doucet wrote:
Not what I've been seeing at all, but we've been working a lot in this area
recently. Please retest with btrfs-next. Thanks,
Hi,
I tested again with kernel 3.3.4 ; I wondered if latest btrfs code is
present in this
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 06:03:50PM +0200, Olivier Doucet wrote:
hello everyone,
I made an overall benchmark of BTRFS against EXT4 and XFS. I'm quite
unhappy with BTRFS results, so maybe tuning was not perfect.
http://www.slideshare.net/ezameku/btrfs-benchmark
All data is vectorial, so
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 06:03:50PM +0200, Olivier Doucet wrote:
hello everyone,
I made an overall benchmark of BTRFS against EXT4 and XFS. I'm quite
unhappy with BTRFS results, so maybe tuning was not perfect.
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 06:03:50PM +0200, Olivier Doucet wrote:
hello everyone,
I made an overall benchmark of BTRFS against EXT4 and XFS. I'm quite
unhappy with BTRFS results, so maybe tuning was not perfect.
http://www.slideshare.net/ezameku/btrfs-benchmark
All data is vectorial, so
Hi,
I uploaded the PDF on Dropbox that does not require login
https://www.dropbox.com/s/5i8l0kmdutxj6pb/sysbench-sas3t-btrfs1.pdf
Can you tell us what the unit of the Y-axis is? Is it MB/s or IOPs
or time for a fixed amount data or... ?
Unit is MB/s ;
For each test, I gather speed every
