On Fri, June 22, 2012 at 16:23 (+0200), Josef Bacik wrote:
> On 06/22/2012 09:38 AM, Jan Schmidt wrote:
>> On Fri, June 22, 2012 at 15:30 (+0200), Josef Bacik wrote:
>>> l2 shouldn't be locked anymore, if we're in push_leaf_left it's because we
>>> cow'ed l2 and are holding a lock on it, so really
On 06/22/2012 09:38 AM, Jan Schmidt wrote:
On Fri, June 22, 2012 at 15:30 (+0200), Josef Bacik wrote:
On 06/22/2012 07:00 AM, Jan Schmidt wrote:
While debugging my tree mod log, after several hours of successful iteration I
finally reached a dead lock. I got stacks with btrfs_next_leaf and
push
On Fri, June 22, 2012 at 15:30 (+0200), Josef Bacik wrote:
> On 06/22/2012 07:00 AM, Jan Schmidt wrote:
>> While debugging my tree mod log, after several hours of successful iteration
>> I
>> finally reached a dead lock. I got stacks with btrfs_next_leaf and
>> push_leaf_left and looked into those
On 06/22/2012 07:00 AM, Jan Schmidt wrote:
While debugging my tree mod log, after several hours of successful iteration I
finally reached a dead lock. I got stacks with btrfs_next_leaf and
push_leaf_left and looked into those.
If I'm not mistaken, there is at least one deadlock situation between
