On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 13:56:19 +0800
Wang Shilong wangsl.f...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
It seems that btrfs automatically assigns a qgroup to newly created
snapshot/subvolume, but does not destroy the qgroup when the
subvolume is deleted.
This should be implemented. And will soon.
Great to
On 08/09/2013 02:42 PM, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 14:08:48 +0800
Wang Shilong wangsl.f...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
0/4494 839516160 18446744073709481984 --- -- want to remove
only this one
13/1 2142674944 2142674944
On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 14:56:15 +0800
Wang Shilong wangsl.f...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
So how exactly should I do it? A bit confused on how to proceed.
btrfs qgroup remove 4494 13/1 mnt
will destroy relation between 4494 and 13/1
Then you can try:
btrfs qgroup destroy 4494 mnt
Excellent,
Hello, just add my answer for a missing question.
On Fri, 09 Aug 2013 13:56:19 +0800
Wang Shilong wangsl.f...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
It seems that btrfs automatically assigns a qgroup to newly created
snapshot/subvolume, but does not destroy the qgroup when the
subvolume is deleted.
Hello,
On 08/09/2013 01:39 PM, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I'm using qgroups and have created a few hundreds of subvolumes in the
past.
It seems that btrfs automatically assigns a qgroup to newly created
snapshot/subvolume, but does not destroy the qgroup when the subvolume
is deleted.
This