On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 02:59:45PM +0200, Martin Mailand wrote:
Am 19.10.2011 11:49, schrieb David Sterba:
It would be interesting what's the value of 'extent_type' at the time of
crash, if it's eg -1 that could point to a real bug, some unhandled
corner case in truncate, for example.
How
Hi Anand,
I changed the replication level of the rbd pool, from one to two.
ceph osd pool set rbd size 2
And then during the sync the bug happened, but today I could not
reproduce it.
So I do not have a testcase for you.
Best Regards,
martin
Am 19.10.2011 17:02, schrieb Anand Jain:
I
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:04:01PM +0200, Martin Mailand wrote:
[28997.273289] [ cut here ]
[28997.282916] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:1163!
1119 fi = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, path-slots[0],
1120 struct
Am 19.10.2011 11:49, schrieb David Sterba:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:04:01PM +0200, Martin Mailand wrote:
[28997.273289] [ cut here ]
[28997.282916] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:1163!
1119 fi = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, path-slots[0],
1120
Martin,
workload is a ceph osd.
I tried to play with ceph here and not a complete success yet.
any idea what was done on the system at the time of the problem ?
and any specific command that could trigger this again ?
Thanks.
anand
Best Regards,
Martin
[28997.273289] [
