On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 4:04 PM Pete wrote:
> snapshots. You need to delete it out of them as well which defeats the
> idea of read only snapshots if you are using them.
I wouldn't say it defeats the idea of read-only snapshots. If you want
to be able to "go back in time" and see what changed,
On 09/19/2018 03:41 PM, Piotr Pawłow wrote:
> Hello,
>> If the limit is 100 or less I'd need use a more complicated
>> rotation scheme.
>
> If you just want to thin them out over time without having selected "special"
> monthly, yearly etc snapshots, then my favorite scheme is to just compare
On 2018/9/15 上午5:05, James A. Robinson wrote:
> The mail archive seems to indicate this list is appropriate
> for not only the technical coding issues, but also for user
> questions, so I wanted to pose a question here. If I'm
> wrong about that, I apologize in advance.
>
> The page
>
>
On 09/15/2018 05:56 AM, James A. Robinson wrote:
> [...]
>
> I've got to read up a bit more on subvolumes, I am missing some
> context from the warnings given by Chris regarding per-subvolume
> options.
Btrfs lets you mount the filesystem multiple times, e.g. with a
different subvolume id, so
Wow, thank to everyone for all that information, I'm going to have to
take some time to digest everything. :)
I just wanted to quickly say one thing: As Duncan surmised, I'm not
treating this as my primary backup, but more of an experimental add-on
feature. The primary backup goes to an ext4
James A. Robinson posted on Fri, 14 Sep 2018 14:05:29 -0700 as excerpted:
> The mail archive seems to indicate this list is appropriate for not only
> the technical coding issues, but also for user questions, so I wanted to
> pose a question here. If I'm wrong about that, I apologize in advance.
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 3:05 PM, James A. Robinson
wrote:
> https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Incremental_Backup
>
> talks about the basic snapshot capabilities of btrfs and led
> me to look up what, if any, limits might apply. I find some
> threads from a few years ago that talk about
Thanks very much for the useful information. I'll give the simple
scheme a try, after I adjust mount preferences.
Jim
Hi,
On 09/14/2018 11:05 PM, James A. Robinson wrote:
> The mail archive seems to indicate this list is appropriate
> for not only the technical coding issues, but also for user
> questions, so I wanted to pose a question here. If I'm
> wrong about that, I apologize in advance.
It's fine. Your
