On 08/21/2012 10:33 PM, David Sterba wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:30:14PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
>> IMO the following is better, just make use of the original check. If you
>> agree with this,
>> I'll send it as a patch :)
>
> I think it's cleaner to keep all flags that get inherited from t
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:30:14PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> IMO the following is better, just make use of the original check. If you
> agree with this,
> I'll send it as a patch :)
I think it's cleaner to keep all flags that get inherited from the
directory -> new file at one place, ie btrfs_inher
On 08/15/2012 06:12 PM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote:
> Hello,
>
> some time ago we discussed on #btrfs that the nocow attribute for files wasn't
> working (around 3.3 or 3.4 kernels). That was evident by files fragmenting
> even
> with the attribute set.
>
> Chris mentioned to find a fix quickl
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 08:05:11AM -0500, Kyle Gates wrote:
> > Is there really a fix upstream for that? Do nocow attribute on files work
> > for
> > anyone already?
>
> IIRC the nocow attribute seems to work if the volume is mounted with
> "nodatasum"
Shouldn't nocow mean also nodatasum *only
Hello,
some time ago we discussed on #btrfs that the nocow attribute for files wasn't
working (around 3.3 or 3.4 kernels). That was evident by files fragmenting even
with the attribute set.
Chris mentioned to find a fix quickly for that, and posted some lines of change
into irc. But recently some
