On 2017-02-14 11:46, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
On 2017-02-14 11:07, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn
wrote:
I was just experimenting with snapshots on 4.9.0, and came across some
unexpected behavior.
The simple explanation is
On 2017-02-14 11:07, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn
wrote:
I was just experimenting with snapshots on 4.9.0, and came across some
unexpected behavior.
The simple explanation is that if you snapshot a subvolume, any files in the
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Austin S. Hemmelgarn
wrote:
> I was just experimenting with snapshots on 4.9.0, and came across some
> unexpected behavior.
>
> The simple explanation is that if you snapshot a subvolume, any files in the
> subvolume that have the NOCOW
On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:30:43 -0500
"Austin S. Hemmelgarn" wrote:
> I was just experimenting with snapshots on 4.9.0, and came across some
> unexpected behavior.
>
> The simple explanation is that if you snapshot a subvolume, any files in
> the subvolume that have the
I was just experimenting with snapshots on 4.9.0, and came across some
unexpected behavior.
The simple explanation is that if you snapshot a subvolume, any files in
the subvolume that have the NOCOW attribute will not have that attribute
in the snapshot. Some further testing indicates that